MONTE CARLO, MONACO - MAY 27: Chelsea Football Club owner and businessman Roman Abramovich is seen outside the Sauber garage before the Monaco Formula One Grand Prix at the Circuit de Monaco on May 27, 2012 in Monte Carlo, Monaco. (Photo by Mark Thompson/Getty Images)
Last night, Graham ran a piece addressing the fact that Chelsea's concern over FFP just got a lot smaller with the vast increase in TV money due to the Premier League. While we were likely in pretty good shape to begin with, having a little less to worry about is never a bad thing. There are, however, plenty of teams around Europe that aren't likely to be in nearly as good condition when UEFA starts passing judgement on clubs that fail to comply. I'm going to briefly touch on several that might have some cause for concern:
- Paris St. Germain: PSG would seem the obvious one here. With rich ownership, they have no issues with spending. They'd seem to offer regular Champions League football and a great city in which to live, so they have no issues attracting great players. Ligue 1 doesn't generate huge revenues outside of France though, and as the new kids on the block they don't have the advertising dollars of a Chelsea. They also have were little in the way of valuable assets to sell. If they keep splashing, they won't have a prayer of compliance.
- Manchester City: The Premier League champions will benefit from the new TV money and sponsorship deals, but their spending spree of the last several years will still be an impossible hurdle. Where Chelsea signed the majority of their stars prior to the FFP accounting, Man City did not have that luxury. Major sales and little spending will be necessary if they are to comply, although they've put in place a solid enough framework that they should be in ok shape down the road.
The interesting thing here is that UEFA will likely have some hard decisions to make when they have to start handing out punishment. I'd say it's probable that 7 of the 9 listed teams will be qualified for the Champions League when we reach the first year of punishments, and I can't see UEFA deciding to go ahead and ban the types of teams we're talking about here.
I'm sure most of the clubs have a better idea of what UEFA is looking for than we do as well. It's hard to see Platini dropping the hammer on the Italian teams that are attempting to save their league with the new TV deal. Frankly, that would just seem to be in the best interest of nobody. If he doesn't bury those clubs though, it's hard to see how he could punish City. City will certainly be showing a positive trend by that point, and if he's not following the letter of the law than he won't have much of a case to hammer them an not the Italians.
The most likely clubs to get the hammer dropped on them would seem to be Malaga, Anzhi, and PSG. Those three will certainly bear watching, as they also seem the most likely to challenge the legality of the new rules in court should UEFA target them. I'd actually be pretty happy to see them continue spending though, as I just don't like the way that FFP was laid out to begin with. I understand that UEFA wants clubs to be sustainable, but I think this rule as it's designed will actually hurt the competitive balance across Europe.