Chelsea Vs. Manchester United: Preview
The last time Manchester United came to Stamford Bridge in league play, it kicked off the rebirth of Chelsea's 2010/11 season. David Luiz and Frank Lampard both found the net in a huge 2-1 win that sparked a rally by the rejuvenated Blues. Ultimately, the charge would fall short, with Carlo Ancelotti's side falling short against United in the Champions League before finishing as runners up in the league, but it was still a vital moment in restoring belief and pride in a flagging squad.
We're in a fairly similar position now. Depressingly, Chelsea are battling it out not for the title but for a top four place. The Manchester squad looks out of reach and it would at this point take a major push just to catch Tottenham Hotspur. A win here would lay down a big marker, but dropping points would put the club in even graver peril of failing to qualify for next season's Champions League.
We've already lost to this team once, back when we were looked at as realistic title contenders. The 3-1 reverse at Old Trafford, which featured the famous Fernando Torres miss, was actually the first league loss Andre Villas-Boas had suffered in more than a year. That seems ludicrous now, of course, but everyone was still pretty confident after the display in Manchester. The Blues had played well (although defended poorly) and if things had gone slightly differently they could easily have been the team that won.
Of course, that's been the story of quite a lot of games this season, so we're perhaps less forgiving of intrepid but ultimately fruitless displays - a brave, quality performance counts for very little compared to three points right now. Unfortunately, we're not really in a position where we're set up to play very well. Didier Drogba and Salomon Kalou are off winning matches (jealous!) at the Africa Cup of Nations. John Terry, Ramires and John Obi Mikel are all confirmed out with injuries. Frank Lampard may or may not be fit to start, and although Michael Essien has returned we don't know how fit he is either. Oh, and left back Ashley Cole is suspended after being sent off against Swansea in the 1-1 midweek draw.
Who does that leave us with? Not a lot, especially in midfield. I'm going to assume Essien's capable of starting, because otherwise I'll start drinking well before is considered appropriate on a Saturday afternoon. If Lampard can't play, Chelsea have three midfielders (Florent Malouda doesn't count, no matter what Villas-Boas might think), and so we have Raul Meireles, Oriol Romeu and Michael Essien all as probable starters.
There has been some suggestion that Chelsea should move to a 4-2-3-1 for this match. The Blues fielded it with some success against United at Old Trafford (they switched in the second half and were immediately rewarded with a Torres goal). The most obvious benefit to such a shape would be that Juan Mata gets to sit in the hole behind the centre forward and is released from his responsibility to mind the fullbacks. It also, as we saw against Swansea, relieves some of the pressure on Chelsea's midfielders - the pivot sits deep and thus can dictate the play without being pressed to death.
There are also some drawbacks. The most obvious is that the only left winger that's really available to the Blues at this point is Florent Malouda, and after a dire display at the Liberty Stadium it might be wise to ignore it entirely. The other is a mirror of the benefit - having two midfielders sitting deep will relieve the pressure on United's midfield and allow them the time and space to start spraying balls to the flanks, something that's incredibly dangerous with the ability of their wingers.
Ultimately, it might be best to proceed with the 4-3-3 for now (unless Essien can't start, in which case Malouda's inclusion necessitates 4-2-3-1). Romeu can pick up Wayne Rooney, and Meireles and Essien can harass whoever Sir Alex Ferguson fields in central midfield. Our United counterparts at the Busby Babe have United as a follows:
Manchester United starting lineup (4-4-1-1): David de Gea; Patrice Evra, Rio Ferdinand, Jonny Evans, Chris Smalling; Park Ji-Sung, Ryan Giggs, Michael Carrick, Antonio Valencia; Wayne Rooney; Danny Welbeck.
To which I would respond...
Chelsea (4-3-3): Petr Cech; Ryan Bertrand, David Luiz, Gary Cahill, Branislav Ivanovic; Oriol Romeu, Raul Meireles, Michael Essien; Juan Mata, Fernando Torres, Daniel Sturridge.
Three of the four most obvious individual battles are wingers vs. fullbacks. Antonio Valencia vs. any left back at Chelsea (including Cole, if he were healthy) is a disaster waiting to happen - the Ecuadorian has been unplayable for the last month or so. We're going to get hit hard there, so it makes sense to get Gary Cahill on the pitch to help cut out crosses, one of the areas the new signing excels.
Fortunately, United's fullbacks don't match up very well against Juan Mata or Danny Sturridge. Sturridge should be able to torch Patrice Evra, especially if the Frenchman advances too high up the pitch to support Park on the attack, and you'd have to be pretty confident about Sturridge being able to deal with Ferdinand as well. Mata, meanwhile, should be able to hang back away from the more defensively inclined Smalling and either exploit the space or draw another United player out of position.
The last battle is Oriol Romeu vs. Wayne Rooney, and that's almost entirely dependent on how well Rooney feels like playing. That one could end up going very badly.
The match is scheduled for 4:00PM GMT (11:00AM EST) on Sunday, but there's some threat of it being cancelled due to heavy (for England) snow. Hopefully* it ends up being played, and we'll see you all tomorrow for the game thread.
*Ish.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The snow is supposed to end at 7:00 AM London time, according to weather.com. The game is at 4:00 PM London time.
That should be enough time to get everything in order, right? Right?
Or am I giving London’s snow removal too much credit?
Editor at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.
This is a city that just doesn't get that much snow
by Graham MacAree on Feb 5, 2012 12:30 AM GMT up reply actions
I noticed that from the various freak-out articles I have read today
Still kind of hoping against hope a big city such as London has good snow removal just in case.
If the game is played, it would be the first Chelsea game ever to air live on network television in the United States. Also, the Super Bowl sucks.
Editor at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.
While the TV deal is cool
it might be cooler to have a team and reinforcements to be able to field. On the other hand, we may as well get it over with.
The level to which I may require drinks and the Puppy Bowl tomorrow depends heavily on the results of this match. Both with be had anyhow, but the amount could vary.
Same here.
Even if we get a good starting lineup to throw out there, there’s almost no attacking options on the bench.
As a New York Jets fan, I hate everything about the Super Bowl.
So this game tomorrow is my Super Bowl. I really hope it’s played, and PLEASE GOD DON’T PLAY 60 FUCKING CROSSES.
My super bowl too
Just can’t really stand all the hype. I like to think that I’m as excited, if not more, for the Chelsea game than anyone else is for the sb
by dodgerboy03 on Feb 5, 2012 2:33 AM GMT via Android app up reply actions
Ignorant brit here
I get that the super bowl is a “football” match… But is it like a cup final or something? Why’s it so special? How come there is only an hour of game play but it takes 3 hours to happen?
Less-ignorant brit here...
The closest approximation to the Super Bowl that we have is the Champions League final (in terms of format, rather than international teams etc). Except, imagine if that was the only tournament – no other leagues, no other cups, no national teams…just the Champions League.
The reason the game takes 3 hours is because there are lots of stops between each play. It allows for rolling substitutions and specialists for each scenario. It also allows for a greater degree of tactical planning etc and is part of what makes the sport great.
To piggy back on this..
I dont know that any of our sports use tables (maybe Nascar comes closest to a table). Instead, we often have a bracket system and play-off games and conferences, and divisions within conferences. You could have a team that maybe only won half their matches, but they may end up on the play-offs with a team that went undefeated in regular season. It’s sort of like if a regular season and a cup structure had a baby. Most of our sports I think finish their seasons with something like this.
We also have TONS of commercial breaks in football. It goes along with the play-by-play decision making, but there will be video reviews of suspect plays (an important feature in American sports that they struggle with when it comes to soccer/football), but all little things lead to commercial breaks and advertising. Gotta get those ads and subliminal messages in place for all the people watching on TV!
Noone's expecting us to win.
So I’d say take united by surprise and play Lukaku up front.I’m just hoping its not a humiliating scoreline.I’d settle for a 3-1 or 2-0 loss
You my dear friend are a pessimist.
I am going for a 2-1 win. Didn’t we defeat City who are better then Utd and even them last year in the same fixture when we were in even worse form.
I don't think we were in worse form against city!
We beat them on the back of very good wins at Newcastle and Valencia, that was our best 3 game run of the season!We also had scored 6 goals in the 2 games prior to the city game and had created many chances something we haven’t looked remotely like doing lately!
by conorjmartin on Feb 5, 2012 11:13 AM GMT up reply actions
I didn't meant that.
I meant that we were in worse form last time in the same fixture the 2-1 win against Utd.
My favoured formation
Cech-Ryan-DL-Cahill-Iva-Romeu-Lampard-Essien-Mata-Lukaku-Sturridge.
If Lampard and Essien are not fit enough to play 90 minutes they can be substituted during halftime.
As for Torres I don’t want to play with a ST who doesn’t want to shot and Lukaku has proved he is good in although not at a same level but how worse can he be.
That's pretty much what I would do
I’d be tempted to start Torres, but apart from that I like your style.
About that even I am confused
But for the surprise element I would have play Lukaku but AVB doesn’t like it.
I hope its cancelled
We need Rami and JT back! We have been terrible in the last couple of weeks as well.
Even without snow
the circumstances on the pitch would be far from ideal, it would be icily frozen
Tor ilisar'thera'nal!




















