Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Russell Westbrook and Kevin Durant's Post-Game 5 Outfits

Napoli Vs. Chelsea: Team News & Tactical Preview

How do I deal with Napoli? Not a bloody clue, mate.

Chelsea take on Napoli at the Stadio San Paolo in the Champions League on Tuesday, battling to become the only English team to advance to the quarterfinals this season. It won't be easy. The Partenopei have already dispatched Manchester City (who, like it or not, are a far stronger team than we are this season), and they're the the kind of side that can beat anyone on their day. On Chelsea's day... well, we haven't seen Chelsea have any sort of day in a while, so let's hope the football gods smile upon us in Italy.

Schedule and team news coming up after the jump...

Star-divide

Schedule

Game Date/Time: Tuesday, February 21st, 7:45 PM GMT (2:45 PM EST).

Venue: Stadio San Paolo, Naples, Italy

TV: FOX Soccer Channel (USA - English), FOX Deportes (USA - Spanish), Sky Sports 2 (UK)

Team News

Napoli

Walter Mazzarri's Napoli are in pretty good shape. Despite a poor start to their domestic campaign, partially due to the manager resting his players in the league to keep them fit for their European matches, they've recently gotten back into the race for the top three and look well placed to end this season in the Champions League spots. Napoli are coming off an emphatic 3-0 win against Fiorentina (resting central midfielder Walter Gargano and goalkeeper Morgan de Sanctis), and their only injury worry is right centre back Hugo Campagnaro, who was withdrawn five minutes into that match, although he'll probably play against Chelsea.

Projected Napoli lineup (3-4-2-1): #1 Morgan de Sanctis (GK), #85 Miguel Britos (LCB), #28 Paolo Cannavaro (CB), #14 Hugo Campagnaro (RCB), #18 Juan Zuniga (LWB), #23 Walter Gargano (CM), #88 Gokhan Inler (CM), #11 Christian Maggio (RWB); #22 Ezequiel Lavezzi (LF), #17 Marek Hamsik (RF); #7 Edinson Cavani (CF).

Chelsea

Chelsea, of course, drew 1-1 against Birmingham City over the weekend. Although that's not a very good result, Andre Villas-Boas will be encouraged by a number of key figures returning to the squad. Ramires, Didier Drogba and Salomon Kalou are all available, which means that we're not going to continue with the Fernando Torres experiment any further and that the midfield is significantly stronger than it has been of late. However, the defence is still looking pretty dicey - John Terry is almost certainly out, while Ashley Cole is unlikely to feature either.

Tactics

Napoli's Shape

Napoli play a shape Chelsea haven't encountered in recent memory - the 3-4-2-1. We ran into a three man back line last season during the 1-0 home loss to Liverpool, but Kenny Dalglish's side is nowhere near as dynamic as the scheme Walter Mazzarri uses. While the personnel get shuffled around, the shape remains more or less the same game to game - three centre backs, two deep-lying central midfielders flanked by the wingbacks and then the famed attacking trident of Marek Hamsik, Ezequiel Lavezzi and Edinson Cavani.

This isn't news, of course. More or less everyone who followed European football to any extent is aware of the way Napoli play and the threat they pose. Let's dig a little deeper into Mazzarri's side.

Common Attack Patterns

Key

Edinson Cavani - C
Ezequiel Lavezzi - L
Marek Hamsik - H
Walter Gargano - G
Gokhan Inler - I
Juan Zuniga - Z
Christian Maggio - M

Left-Sided Counterattack

Napoli are known primarily as a counterattacking side, and they've definitely got the speed and precision to play effectively on the transition. If Napoli can catch the opponent's right back out of position and then win the ball, they'll quickly cycle to one of Gargano or Hamsik for a long diagonal to Lavezzi, who'll be sitting on the Napoli left near the halfway line, generally well clear of a covering centre back:

This is the most dangerous move in Napoli's arsenal. Once free, Lavezzi has several options. He's more than capable of taking on a player one on one, Cavani will be steaming up the centre, and Maggio will be racing down the right back. All three players are lethal - Lavezzi for his speed and dribbling ability, Cavani for his finishing and Maggio for his vision and crossing. The midfielders and Hamsik will also advance in order to recycle the play into a standard built-up attack in case the counter breaks down, while Zuniga will follow behind Lavezzi to prepare for a possible overlap.

Right-Sided Counterattack

Attacking Napoli on their right means that Lavezzi is more easily covered by the right back, making the sweeping diagonals to the Argentinian more difficult. Instead, Cavani is the main target, normally making a run up the right channel:

Cavani is far less effective than Lavezzi at driving through the defence (although that's no slight against the Uruguayan), so he's less inclined to isolate a player and try to beat him. He'll attempt to feed Hamsik running down the right flank, thread a through pass between the centre backs to find Lavezzi or hit Zuniga with a diagonal. Failing that, he'll cut the ball back to one of the midfielders or very occasionally pull off a long-range effort, which he's quite capable of converting:

Buildup

When Napoli have possession but are unable to counter (e.g. from goal kicks), the two main mechanisms they use to build up the play are long punts forward, targetting Lavezzi or Cavani, with the goal being knockdowns to Hamsik or the wingbacks, or more deliberate buildup play through the centre backs. Usually, Gargano will drop deep to receive passes from the centre before attempting long diagonals to the wingbacks, but we often see one of the wingbacks dropping back to pick up the ball or, more rarely, a centre back advancing (this is most common with Hugo Campagnaro).

In all cases the primary mode of opening up the defence is to quickly cycle the ball from flank to flank. Once Napoli establish possession in the attacking third Gargano will sit very deep and dictate play, pushing the ball to the right or left and receiving it in the centre if the attack breaks down but possession is retained. From here, there are four main patterns of attack - wingback overloads on either flank and two distinct types of central play. When Napoli are frustrated, they'll also try long range efforts, from which Inler and Cavani are capable of scoring.

Wingback Overloads

With Edinson Cavani as the team's centre forward, Napoli rightly have no compunctions about crossing the ball. All four wide players are competent crossers, so the ball is a threat whether it's at the feet of Hamsik, Lavezzi, Zuniga or Maggio. With the wingbacks so high up the pitch, overloads are common, especially when the opposition wingers fail to track back effectively.

When Napoli do cross, Cavani mostly takes a central run while the opposite sides forward gets the near post, with the opposite wing back (especially Zuniga) picking up anything that's overhit. Left-sided crosses often see a near-post run from Cavani with Hamsik going central and Maggio coming in at the far post, which is effective at generating chances despite Maggio's poor finishing. The central midfielders tend to stay deep in these situations in order to mop up headed clearances and recycle the ball.

Not all overloads result in a cross, however - Napoli will often use the situation to slip in Hamsik or Lavezzi behind the defence, a situation from which they're both capable of beating their man then scoring, providing a low cross across the six-yard box, or cutting the ball back for Cavani or Inler to run onto. It's worth pointing out that Napoli are far more capable of getting behind the defence on the right side rather than the left because of the presence of Hugo Campagnaro, who'll often advance to provide support, allowing for an zone overload even with two defenders present.

Central Attacking Play

Despite the talk of Napoli having difficulty adjusting to teams that sit deep and do nothing but defending, they're very competent at using vertical and horizontal play in the central zone to draw out the opposition defence and open up space. This occurs when the ball is played central and both wide forwards come infield. Typically, Gargano or Inler will find Hamsik between the defence and the midfield and then Cavani and Lavezzi will start diagonal runs behind the centre backs. Hamsik reads the game well enough to improvise if better options present themselves, including chips over the defensive line, dribbles or surprise passes to the wingbacks.

If the centre backs are tracking the forwards and nullifying Hamsik's ability to run into the centre of the area, Napoli will sometimes switch to a different scheme that sees Gokhan Inler push forward into the space vacated by a defender. This can cause absolute chaos in the area - the box ends up being too crowded to shoot through and the defence tends to collapse inwards the ball, leading to a scramble in a dangerous zone.

Defensive Tendencies

With the team heavily focused on transition play, Napoli like to win the ball high up the pitch. Rather than allowing their opposition to build from the back, Lavezzi and Hamsik will press the centrebacks aggressively before defensive responsibility switches to the four-man line belt in front of the defence when the ball crosses the halfway line. At this point, Hamsik will act as a fairly defensive winger, Lavezzi will stay high up the pitch and Cavani, who is a very capable defensive player, will reinforce areas that need help.

Inler and Gargano will trade off staying in the middle and moving to a flank depending of which side of the field the ball is on, while the centre backs typically stay very compact, which means that if the wingbacks can be bypassed there's a very good chance of getting a good cross in. Another weakness is that opposing teams meeting resistance can cycle the ball backwards with minimal pressure and switch play quickly. A third is that none of their defenders is actually particularly good at defending. They rely on playing in close support to prevent opposition attacks.

Napoli's habit of pushing their wingbacks so high up the pitch means that they are vulnerable to transitions themselves. If a quick outlet is found to a winger, they're often able to isolate a centre back and then push on to goal, which stretches up and opens huge holes in the back line.

Morgan de Sanctis is what Ray Wilkins has described as an 'unorthodox' goalkeeper. He is typically highly aggressive in commanding his area and is willing to take risks many more conservative goalkeepers would not. As a result, he's prone to bizarre-looking gaffes at times. He's an well above-average shot stopper, however.

Set Pieces

Attack

Ezequiel Lavezzi and Marek Hamsik are the main corner kick takers, with Walter Gargano taking non-shooting free kicks. The primary targets on set pieces tend to be Cavani (near post), Hamsik (central), Cannavaro (far post) and Maggio (deep, central). Short corner kick routines are not uncommon, although they tend to be less effective for Napoli than long ones, and free kicks are often spread wide while the defence is clustered in the centre. Napoli don't tend to shoot directly from free kicks unless Goran Pandev is on the field.

Defence

Napoli appear to play a hybrid zonal-man marking system when defending set pieces, assigning specific defenders to some players but allowing the rest to cover areas rather than individuals. Cavani tends to be assigned to the near post, with the centre backs tracking runs to the back. This leaves a weakness on deeper deliveries that Napoli have yet to address.

Substitutions

When Mazzarri is desperate he'll take off a central defender, add an attacker (Goran Pandev or Eduardo Vargas) and go to a 4-4-2. While this does add a different dimension, exploiting Cavani's ability to knock down the ball for a support striker, none of the substitutes available to Mazzarri is much more than a week replacement for a player already on the team except for Pandev, who is more of an all-around forward. Depth is one of Napoli's major weaknesses, which has been exposed by the squad rotation policy employed by the team so far this year.

Projected Chelsea Lineup

The primary question for Villas-Boas involves shutting down the Napoli attack. In terms of pure football, this requires stopping Cavani and Lavezzi, the main goalscoring threats. If the defence is off its game, there's very little that the manager will be able to do about it - he'll simply have to throw the best defensive lineup out there that he can (i.e. Branislav Ivanovic at right back). If things go wrong, that's what happens when you face absolutely world-class players.

That said, there are obvious tactical remedies to much of Napoli's threats. The three key players from a team perspective are Gargano and the wingbacks, and Chelsea would do very well to play close attention to them. Gargano, who plays very deep, should be man-marked by a competent defensive player. Juan Mata will not be able to deal with him effectively due to Gargano's ability to turn (and Mata's inability to deal with players turning him). Although Frank Lampard isn't noted as a defensive player, he has the ability to deal with Gargano physically and won't get turned around by the little midfielder, although Michael Essien, Ramires and Oriol Romeu are all probably better options. Inler is more of a box to box type, and he's not as important to the attack as Gargano is, although it would be best to follow him around as well.

There are multiple solutions to the wingback problem. Chelsea can rely on the fullbacks to take care of things and then add competent attacking wingers to pin Zuniga/Maggio deeper than they'd like. With Ashley Cole's injury, such a strategy would be easier to enforce on the right side than the left, where you'd expect Ivanovic to be solid. This allows Chelsea to play Daniel Sturridge in order to take advantage of the one-on-one matchup against Napoli's left centre back. The left side will almost certainly require a defensive winger, which means one of Florent Malouda or Salomon Kalou. One would hope we see Kalou there just based on recent form.

In order to deal with Napoli's crossing and set piece ability, it'd be wise to include competent aerial players. For Chelsea, assuming Terry is out, that means Gary Cahill, Didier Drogba and Ivanovic. Pretty simple stuff, although unless Chelsea sort out their comedic defending on set pieces every corner and free kick will be a problem.

The major problem that's left is fitting Mata into all of this. We don't want to create any defensive holes for Napoli to exploit, but without Mata we're more or less toothless, which means he has to play. The only sensible answer I have to this is a mostly-flat 4-3-3, which leaves Mata in the centre but with minimal defensive responsibilities.

Shake all of that up (plus some extras, including who's rested and who isn't) and you get this:

Chelsea starting lineup (4-3-3): #1 Petr Cech (GK); #17 Jose Bosingwa (LB), #4 David Luiz (LCB), #24 Gary Cahill (RCB), #2 Branislav Ivanovic (RB); #6 Oriol Romeu (CM), #10 Juan Mata (CM), #5 Michael Essien (CM); #21 Salomon Kalou (LF), #11 Didier Drogba (CF), #23 Daniel Sturridge (RF).

Here's how it would set up, with Napoli in red and Chelsea in blue:

The key here is Romeu, which could be very dangerous. He'll be tasked with pick up Inler when he comes deep as well as helping the defence with Hamsik and Lavezzi when they come infield. The last time Romeu played was in the second half of the 3-3 draw against Manchester United, where he completely failed to pick up Wayne Rooney. He'll have to do much better here or Chelsea will be in deep trouble.

Ed note: I've left out Ramires, which many are asking me about. Certainly he's an option here at CM (replacing Romeu or Essien) or at RF, where he's played before and would provide far more defensive support for Ivanovic than Sturridge would. For me, however, he's not the defender Romeu or Essien is and is also more prone to giving up possession by making what would be in this case ill-advised attacking runs, and Ivanovic doesn't really need that much support. Also, he's just back from a knee injury and played 90 minutes of football on Saturday.

Can the Blues win at the San Paolo? Certainly. I don't think they should be going for a 0-0 draw. Napoli's attack (and especially counterattack) might be dangerous, but their defence is weak and Chelsea should be capable of exploiting that. The order of the day should be to keep possession and to play quick vertical football when holes open up. Risky passes with too many players committed forward are to be avoided as much as possible - patient buildup and long passing should be the order of the day rather than silly flicks and tricks.

This isn't Mission Impossible, and we don't need to hide in a hole. Do that for long enough and Napoli will score. Force them onto the back foot without opening a big door for Lavezzi and Cavani to steal in on, and Chelsea will be fine. That is, of course, easier said than done.

Comment 120 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Soooo...Just Fucking Run About A Bit?

I kid.
I guess I’ll have to go read it now.

by DPeezy on Feb 21, 2012 4:59 AM GMT reply actions  

As mentioned already below, we definitely need a way to fit Ramires in

My preference is as the right wing/forward (and sit Danny – there is no way we can afford his lack of defense on Maggio’s side). He can’t finish like Danny, but he’s got speed for days and loves to take on people. He could easily destroy whomever Napoli trots out there at LCB.

I don’t think Romeu needs to be out there. NEED MOAR MIKEL!

by DPeezy on Feb 21, 2012 5:21 AM GMT up reply actions  

Right. I type much slower than my mind.

Which is amazing, as I’m pretty [fun]ing “slow”

What I meant is keeping Danny in the lineup (as the left winger) whilst having Ramires as the right wing/forward.

by DPeezy on Feb 21, 2012 5:23 AM GMT up reply actions  

Gotcha

If Maggio was the left back, this would all look a lot happier.

by Graham MacAree on Feb 21, 2012 5:25 AM GMT up reply actions  

that video you put in there

made me cry. go that scary. but yeah I agree with pretty much everything you said, I also like the flexibility we have now with our players back. I hope and pray for the best!

by Kunta Kinte on Feb 21, 2012 5:13 AM GMT via mobile reply actions  

I think we should fit Rambo in there somewhere. Two options where I think he could fit in.

Replacing Romeu. Rambo will have no trouble keeping up with Hamsik, Lavezzi or Inler (or you could put Essien back there and put Ramires in Essien’s place).

The second option would be to replace Danny with Rambo. Rambo may not be as skilled or as tricky, but he’s more pacey (I think) and he’ll have no trouble running up and down our right flank. Could be a great out ball for counters too. Ideally, I’d like Rambo on our left flank, to help out Bosingwa/Bertrand, but I think you said something about him drifting to the right.

by Valens on Feb 21, 2012 5:15 AM GMT reply actions  

I agree, that's a possibilty

I thought about it and forgot to put it in there.

by Graham MacAree on Feb 21, 2012 5:16 AM GMT up reply actions  

The note I added:

I’ve left out Ramires, which many are asking me about. Certainly he’s an option here at CM (replacing Romeu or Essien) or at RF, where he’s played before and would provide far more defensive support for Ivanovic than Sturridge would. For me, however, he’s not the defender Romeu or Essien is and is also more prone to giving up possession by making what would be in this case ill-advised attacking runs, and Ivanovic doesn’t really need that much support. Also, he’s just back from a knee injury and played 90 minutes of football yesterday.

by Graham MacAree on Feb 21, 2012 5:20 AM GMT up reply actions  

Fair points Graham. Like I said before, it would be ideal if he could replace Kalou, since

our left could use more reinforcement with Bosingwa/Bertrand/Out-of-form Cole there. If that isn’t possible, I wouldn’t complain if he doesn’t start.

by Valens on Feb 21, 2012 5:25 AM GMT up reply actions  

I dunno, Graham.

Shoulda found a video with a more excited announcer. Guy almost put me to sleep.

Bullpen Banter
Fan: Seattle Mariners, Seattle Sounders FC, Liverpool
Twitter

by c_dowley on Feb 21, 2012 5:20 AM GMT reply actions  

I am very nervous about this game.

That said I think a draw is a very realistic possibility. A win would be amazing, but seems unlikely given recent form. Here’s to hoping Drogba plays like it’s Valencia again.

by Kjell on Feb 21, 2012 5:30 AM GMT reply actions  

Also perform well

When teams come at us. Napoli will come at us. We should perform well in a open game

by Kunta Kinte on Feb 21, 2012 5:57 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

I mean

Sometime during the game theyre more likely to try and attack when compared to other teams that we have this season and have park the bus. The game will be open in that sense

by Kunta Kinte on Feb 21, 2012 6:14 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

not sure if troll

SB Nation's World Soccer Editor, manager of Cartilage Free Captain, contributor to Acme Packing Company.

by Kevin McCauley on Feb 21, 2012 7:34 AM GMT up reply actions  

We could just kill ourselves

would be easier

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 10:28 AM GMT up reply actions  

What about playing a 4-4-1-1?

cech
ivanovic-cahill-luiz-bosingwa
sturridge-essien-romeu-ramires
lampard
drogba

I haven’t include Mata in, because I believe Chelsea could still produce without him.

by MarcusCFC on Feb 21, 2012 7:32 AM GMT reply actions  

If anything you swap Lampard for Mata

by ant0n on Feb 21, 2012 7:42 AM GMT up reply actions  

Mata doesn't do defensively

Don’t think he can close down like Lampard can.

by MarcusCFC on Feb 21, 2012 8:26 AM GMT up reply actions  

We cant just sit back and let them pick at us until the ball goes into the net. We need to have some form of attacking drive, something which Mata offers more as a CAM than Lampard. Having Essien and Romeu there behind him will give a good sturdy midfield. As much as don’t want to concede, we also need that away goal

by ant0n on Feb 21, 2012 8:34 AM GMT up reply actions  

I believe we still can

We didn’t had Mata in the past few seasons and we did well too. Mata sure offers more creativity, but Lampard offers a lot also. There’s a reason he gets 20 goals and 10 assists per season!

I still believe he has it. We need to attack definitely, but I believe Lampard can offer it.

by MarcusCFC on Feb 21, 2012 1:22 PM GMT up reply actions  

Don't wanna question Lampard's contributions in the past

but Lampard’s best days haven’t been in that exact position and as far as I recall Ancelotti tried to play him in that position without yielding any results

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 2:34 PM GMT up reply actions  

Yeah, Lamps is probably the worst player in that position.

He has very few of the qualities of a No. 10. I’m not sure we’d need to worry that much about defensive strength with that midfield.

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Feb 21, 2012 2:38 PM GMT up reply actions  

Hasn't that been his best position?

He wants to play that position also doesn’t he?

by MarcusCFC on Feb 21, 2012 2:42 PM GMT up reply actions  

Lampard is a weird player.

He’s not a good passer or creator in the way that you want a No. 10 to be. He’s basically a poacher who operates from midfield.

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Feb 21, 2012 2:43 PM GMT up reply actions  

So you kinda disproved yourself?

Midfield poacher is an oxymoron to begin with then. And Lampard arriving late to finish is not nearly classic poacher style anyway.

by DPeezy on Feb 21, 2012 6:03 PM GMT up reply actions  

Yeah my bad

But we definitely want him in this game, we need his poaching skill and well timed late runs

by MarcusCFC on Feb 21, 2012 2:49 PM GMT up reply actions  

But with that lineup

it would be very difficult to form an offensive force … making Drogba easily isolated upfront. Unless we simply want to park the bus, but then again I wonder if we can seriously consider that today

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 10:31 AM GMT up reply actions  

Put MacAree in the center

We can see he has the engine.

Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Feb 21, 2012 7:35 AM GMT reply actions  

drogba and torres

Shouldn’t it make more sense if we went with a leap sided 442?
Cech-brana-cahill-luiz- ryan or jose
Ramirez essian lampard mata
Drogba and torres
433 wouldn’t work because main reason being once drogba hold up ball his only out let would be mata and danny
Which would play in napoli favour to counter attack on the winger while our winger is supporting play.
4231 playing with essian and romeu would put too much pressure on mata to break down napoli.
Play with 2 up front would alone one of striker to double up on the wingback and also sit on the DM mid wen they shift play

by theonetoppa on Feb 21, 2012 7:39 AM GMT via mobile reply actions  

We have learnt our lesson that Drogba and Torres cannot play together, so this would be a very poor decision

by ant0n on Feb 21, 2012 7:43 AM GMT up reply actions  

I find it difficult to compare Gerrard and Drogba

in a sense to say he could have played with Gerrard to be an argument for he could play with Drogba, so I’d still say there was never a point in his career where he could have played alongside Drogba convincingly

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 12:31 PM GMT up reply actions  

Except my "can't play with anyone" comment meant any football player

He can’t play with Drogba, or Sturridge, or Lampard, or Malouda, or even Mata.

by Al Benson on Feb 21, 2012 12:38 PM GMT up reply actions  

Oh, OK

I referred to the higher up idea of Torres playing together with another striker

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 2:34 PM GMT up reply actions  

Having Mata on the flank is a no-no

With Maggio there, and no help from Mata and relying on Bosingwa to clean up the shores isn’t exactly the smartest way to play Napoli.

by MarcusCFC on Feb 21, 2012 7:45 AM GMT up reply actions  

Excellent work Graham

From an analysis point of view, it’s like “tactically-exciting” to have Chelsea come up against a team like Napoli.

On a pure fandom level, it’s terrifying.

by TPalmer on Feb 21, 2012 7:52 AM GMT reply actions  

Also...

David Luiz and Raul Meireles are yellow cards away from a suspension. I think Raul we can handle, but the prospect of missing Luiz for the second leg is concerning.

by TPalmer on Feb 21, 2012 7:55 AM GMT up reply actions  

This is an excellently written article... Can scare Pep G if he reads .. :)

I feel 4–3–2–1 formation can be of great benefit though.. Keeping a tight defence & a compact midfield can take care of Napoli’s mid & att….with some pains of course…

While the attacking trio, can lure Napoli’s defence & open up space…

Cech -

Ivanovic - Cahill – Luiz - Bosingwa ( or Bertrand ???)

Ramires — Essien – Super Frankie

Sturridge — Mata

Drogba

by prasadkoranne on Feb 21, 2012 7:55 AM GMT reply actions  

Great job on the analysis. This was a fantastic read.

I feel like our most effective plan would be to try to play deep and counter their counter attacks (tactics!) through speed down the wing. If we can get a quick ball out to Sturridge on the right, or whoever is playing on the left (hopefully Mata is playing centrally) we can hopefully hit them when their wingbacks push forward.
Does anybody remember the lineup we played against Newcastle before the Valencia game? Because that game should be our blueprint that we try to emulate tomorrow. If we defend deep against Napoli, we can hopefully quell their attacking threat and force them to break us down, which means they would hopefully start pushing their wingbacks forward and then we try to hit them quick.

My lineup of choice (assuming Terry, but not Cole is fit, which I feel will be the case):
4-2-3-1
Cech
Ivanovic-Luiz- Terry-Bosingwa
-—-Essien—Lampard
Sturridge-Mata-Ramires
-——Drogba——

Bosingwa at LB is a mistake waiting to happen, but if Ramires plays on the left he should be able to track back and help out defensively, he also has pace in abundance to break forward. Lampard and Mata are the two key men for this to work. The idea would be to defend deep, win the ball back in midfield, and let Mata and Lampard move the ball quickly out to the wings so Ramires and Sturridge can use their pace to get at the Napoli defence and hopefully tee up Drogba up in the box. Also, having Drogba in the side should help for knockdowns to Sturridge and Ramires to break quickly at the defence (a la Sturridge’s shot from Torres’ knockdown against Birmingham).

All things considered, I’m not entirely optimistic for this game, I’m just so goddamn curious as to how its going to play out. My hope for tomorrow is get an away goal, and hopefully not let them put too many past us. I expect either a 1-1 draw or 2-1 defeat, with either Sturridge or Drogba on the scoresheet for us. However, we definitely can win this, and if we do, this really could jumpstart our season. Fingers crossed!

https://twitter.com/#!/gold_e

by gold_e on Feb 21, 2012 8:05 AM GMT reply actions  

My Comments (TL;DR is acceptable)

I think Napoli is so weird formation wise that Chelsea needs to change to fit into this formation. The key is to mess up Napoli’s three man backfield and dominate the middle of the pitch with an extra MF option. Possession alone is a mistake with Napoli’s counter attacking prowess especially on the flanks. So basically Chelsea needs a fast RB for Lavezzi, height and speed for Cavani, and solid defensive MFs to cover Zuniga and Maggio. The key IMHO is to push the wingbacks and MFs so deep that Napoli’s front three are isolated. Then make Hamsik and Lavezzi suffer by playing defense all 90 minutes.

Against a three man back you have one real option, playing a lone striker. Three forwards is suicide and two forwards plays into Napoli’s hands. If we’re going with a lone striker it has to be Drogba. Napoli sit back meaning playing over their rather short back three is a real necessity and Drogba’s strength and speed should be a huge advantage today. My next roster situation of importance is RB. RB is going to need speed (not Ivanovic) and be a great defender (not Bosingwa). I think we have one option only and that’s a non-defender which sounds crazy but is the smartest move, Essien. It won’t happen but maybe it should. Zuniga and Maggio remove Sturridge and Mata from consideration at the wide MF positions. Lampard at LM and Ramires at RM might seem crazy but I think it makes sense. Ramires is good defensively and can shut down Napoli’s 4th best attacking option all while giving Chelsea a speedy counter option. At RM he can man mark Zuniga match his speed and then hopefully exploit the space in behind him allowing Chelsea a fast break option. Lamaprd is solid defensively (especially compared to Kalou, Mata, Sturridge, etc.) and at LM Lampard would be able to cut in on his better foot to fill the huge void between Napoli’s CBs and their MFs. Lampard is also needed for his free kick ability (which we need to utilize with Napoli’s general lack of height) and penalty kick coverage. Maggio is a good player but he’s not elite going forward or defending. Lampard trumps him going both ways. Mata NEEDS to play and the only sensible spot for him is as a floating CAM where he can play behind Inler and Gargano. Mata in a free role and in space should be fun to watch. Mata should be able to create, create, create much like Ozil for Germany. His only defensive responsibility is as an extra body in the MF. On fast breaks he should have plenty of room vertically between Napoli’s lines and horizontally between Inler and Gargano. Mata here is the key to winning. He unlocks Ramires and Lampard, let’s Drogba concentrate on scoring or being an ariel threat and not on creating, and he should also be able to run full speed at a rather slow back three.

Compared to Gargano, Inler is the more advanced MF so Romeu would mark him. Romeu seems okay for this role even though he got torched against Man U. Remeber Inler is not Rooney and Romeu is pretty good at being a pesky CDM. Our MF options all are between “meh” and “sucky” but Gargano likes to play almost a CDM role so Mikel as the leaset worst option can play against him. Mikel used to be a decent attacking option and honestly all he needs to do here is stay close enough to Gargano that Gargano can’t make a huge diagonal pass. Mikel’s height will give us another tall player to help on free/corner kicks. Since Essien won’t really be our RB I’d want him in Mikel’s spot where he can counter and mark Gargano. His speed, strength and creativity should really help Mata, Lampard, Drogba and Ramires create chances going forward.

Ideally Essien covers Lavazzi but it’ll be Ivanovic and I’ll take the over on times Lavezzi burns Ivanovic. Honestly, what’s more scary Lavezzi playing a more forward role against Ivanovic or Lavezzi tracking Essien all day to the point that he’s nowhere near his LW position? I think the Luiz-Cahill partnership is okay today. Normally I like two smart and safe players in UEFA because a red card early could be the end of our Champion League experience. Luiz in an EPL game is scary but at least it’s just one game. Here, it’s everything! However, Luiz is good most of the time and he seems calmer playing with Cahill. Maybe I’m imagining that. If Essien matched up with Lavezzi like I think he would that would let Luiz play higher up the pitch taking Cavani on earlier (thus less chance for a red as a last defender). Cahill seems calm and collected but maybe not fast enough for Cavani so playing deep in a clean up capacity seems smart. Without Essien though I’m afraid Luiz will be split half covering Cavani and Lavezzi meaning Cavani goes more or less one on one with Cahill which I don’t like. LB is screwy. Cole has been so bad I don’t know if I’d start him if he was healthy. Bosingwa was good against Man U but his opponent wanted to cut in onto Bosingwa’s strong foot. Hamsik plays narrower than a RW but he doesn’t need to cut inside. He’s perfectly happy going outside the LB and playing in crosses to Cavani/Lavezzi. I don’t think Bosingwa works here. Bertrand would be my first option. His speed should match Hamsik’s and he can offer Chelsea some cover for the hopefully right footed (since it shouldn’t be Mata) LW. Bertrand’s defense is as good as Bosingwa’s most days and he’s less likely to just not show up. Certainly Bosingwa on a good day is better than Bertrand but Bertrand is probably more reliable.

Now Sturridge isn’t in my lineup and there’s a simple reason, defensively he’s a HUGE liability. However, there are three ways I’d see Sturridge against Napoli. 1) If/when Drogba wears out (especially after ACON) then I’d like to see Sturridge and not Torres come in as his sub. Sturridge is the hottest forward for Chelsea at the moment and his speed which is a huge asset might be even more important against an exhausted back line. 2) If Napoli plays a weird formation to match Chelsea and plays a CB at LB or 3) If Napoli goes up by two or more goals. If none of these happen though I’d like Sturridge to sit. I’d rather play defensively sound and play for a home win. Napoli are VERY good and having a winger who doesn’t play defense sounds suicidal. I really think they have the best starting 11 in Italy, they just have no depth so they had to choose between UEFA and Serie A and they chose UEFA unfortunately.

by Kman23 on Feb 21, 2012 8:07 AM GMT reply actions  

I haven't seen Essien be anywhere near as speedy since his latest comeback as he once was, so hopefully Ivan is up for this

Lampard out left would certainly be an interesting experiment, but I think you’re underrating Maggio offensively a great deal and overrating any ability that SuperFrank may have of actually attacking a fullback and “cutting in” onto his right.

Of course, as we’re all throwing out sensible ideas out here, let us watch in horror as AVB goes with his “usual” 4-3-3.

by DPeezy on Feb 21, 2012 9:13 AM GMT up reply actions  

Essien's Speed

He’s certainly slowed but he’s still way faster than Ivanovic. I think there are maybe 5 players that can keep up with Lavezzi in the major 4 leagues and unfortunately we don’t have one of those guys (or even the tier just below).

I’ll admit I’ve only seen about 5 Napoli games but with one exception, Maggio has been good but not great in my opinion. I can see the potential but I haven’t seen a great all around game, just a few small glimpses. Lampard can cut in on his right foot although it’s rare. i saw him do it a couple of times playing for England (maybe against Germany in SA?) and that’s where I got the idea that he’d be a good wide player if he needed to be. I don’t think against EPL quality fullbacks he could beat them inside but against a converted RM, yes he can.

by Kman23 on Feb 21, 2012 9:57 AM GMT up reply actions  

Surely if that was the route you planned on taking for the game, shouldn't Ramires

play RB? But thats besides the point, if AVB sets-up a team built for the sole purpose of matching up against Napoli were not going to win this match, we need to force the issue to Napoli and playing Ivan at LB and Ramires/Essien at RB will give the Napoli team a big psychological edge. My thoughts are stick to the 4-2-3-1:
Cech
Ivanovic, Cahill, Luiz, Bertrand/Bossy;
Ramires, Essien;
Sturridge, Mata, Kalou;
Drogba.
Alternatively the more intriguing prospect would be (although AVB won’t risk doing) is changing our formation to a 3-4-3 ourselves:
-———————Cech,
-—Ivanonvic, Cahill, Luiz;
Ramires—————————-Bertrand;
-————-Essien, Mikel——————
-—Sturridge,———-Mata—————
-——————-Drogba————————
Just an idea but it would’ve needed preparation on the training ground (although we’ve had two months to prepare).

by Toosy_13 on Feb 21, 2012 1:20 PM GMT up reply actions  

In general, you want to have an extra man at the back

So 3-v-3, with our back three against their front would have fairly tragic outcomes, I’m pretty certain…

Exactly matching the other team’s formation, unless you’re much better at executing it than they are, is also a general no-no…

(That being said, in the future, I’d love to see us use a 3-man back line with truly advanced wing backs. It’s a fun way to play.)

by DPeezy on Feb 21, 2012 4:31 PM GMT up reply actions  

I'd think this would happen

sooner than Torres up front without Drogba. Oddly enough, in a recent match they managed to link up a couple of times, but Torres was more withdrawn as a striker. Torres then reverted back to playing more like a striker, less like a playmaker, but still wandered all over. So, totally doubtful, but if AVB was to surprise us with Torres, I’d expect this to be it.

by alynne4307 on Feb 21, 2012 3:41 PM GMT up reply actions  

I like your formation

But I don’t want Kalou at any cost. Last game I remember him beginning (Carling Cup not included) was the PL match against WBA and that was torture. He was substituted before the halftime and it helped us. Putting Sturridge and Kalou together is not good both of them are inside forwards and not wingers. I would rather have Malouda than Kalou. I would want Ramires because his pace can help us cover more Napoli players and Romeu has been not been impressive recently. This what I will like:
Cech
Ivanovic-Cahill-Luiz-Bosingwa
Ramires
Lampard-Essien
Sturridge Mata
Drogba
Lampard is the only midfielder who can play long balls. So he is a must. As for Mata’s defensive incapibilities Essien will be playing as LCM to help him out. Ramires although doesn’t posses Romue’s defensive abilities but is more pacy and can cover more then 1 guys. Essien can cover for Ramires if he makes forward runs. Although there is a lot of workload on Essien but if there is someone who can handle it, its him.

by Archit Arya on Feb 21, 2012 12:24 PM GMT reply actions  

I said this a few days ago for a lineup

Cech
Bane, Cahill, Luiz, Bossy
Romeu
Essien , Rambo
Sturridge, Drogba, Mata

We could play this as a 4-3-3 / 4-3-1-2 hybrid, depending on whether Mata is feeling best out wide or centrally. It puts Ramires in there, it doesn’t leave us open to attacks particularly, and we could make good use of the long ball. Plus with Essien AND Ramires right in behind the front 3, they can bomb forward on counter-attacks and provide the necessary engine to execute them quickly.

This is my favored 11.

by FootieFromAfar on Feb 21, 2012 1:26 PM GMT via mobile reply actions  

park the bus and nick it 1 - 0

4-4-1-1 diamond

cech
Ivan. cahill. terry. Luiz.
rambo. essien. lamps.
Mata
danny and drogs

defend. defend defend.
frustrate the oppos players and fans.
pinch a cheaky one late on.

win ugly.

by MrMoreton on Feb 21, 2012 1:58 PM GMT via mobile reply actions  

AVB should he stay or go?

I think AVB’s future at Chelsea could depend alot on tonights result at Napoli. There are problems at the Bridge, and it is time for Abramovich to back his man by telling the world that they are building a new team for the future. Or sack Villas-Boas and bring in a new man to do as he is told.

by topvar on Feb 21, 2012 2:02 PM GMT reply actions  

Thought of this again

Though in all honesty, at Chelsea it’s always the manager who pays the price, deservedly or not. So it wouldn’t surprise me at all when we get thrashed today to see a “Bye bye AVB” news. That doesn’t mean sacking him is a good idea at all

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 2:37 PM GMT up reply actions  

In that case, it should been at Everton!

We could have made it an annual tradition.

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Feb 21, 2012 2:39 PM GMT up reply actions  

Scolari was sacked after Everton too?

Memory failing again … sorry … but the last Scolari games were something I tried to put out of misery :)

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 2:48 PM GMT up reply actions  

Ancelotti - yes

but Ancelotti was at the end of the season. If we wanna sack AVB now after Napoli (provided we get thrashed today) then it would be mid-season, and the last manager sacked mid season was … well … Scolari ;)

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 3:01 PM GMT up reply actions  

Well, since JT and Ash are out, no.

That looks like a clever suicide note against a team like Napoli, which makes me glad it’s not real.

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Feb 21, 2012 2:08 PM GMT up reply actions  

hahahaha

Should be fun if Mazzari thinks its true and plans accordingly

by Rohi D on Feb 21, 2012 2:18 PM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

That would maddening.

If someone could be that big of an idiot and turn out such a good team, and AVB can only produce what we’ve seen, I’d jump off a bridge. : P

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Feb 21, 2012 2:27 PM GMT up reply actions  

Honestly, Graham needs to off himself because we bought Cahill, then...

…I’ve got two or three to do before this one, assuming Mazzari would ever be that kind of idiot.

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Feb 21, 2012 2:40 PM GMT up reply actions  

But I thought it needs to be done in a row

with the victim in line! :P

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 2:47 PM GMT up reply actions  

I haven't seen the pics...

What’s the leaked team like?

by Rohi D on Feb 21, 2012 2:42 PM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

I haven't seen the pics...

What’s the leaked team like?

by Rohi D on Feb 21, 2012 2:43 PM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

A 4-3-3 of:

Cech
Branko, Cahill, JT, Ash
Essien
Raul Frank
Rambo Mata
Danny

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Feb 21, 2012 2:45 PM GMT up reply actions  

Normalwise I'd say

a lineup that doesn’t include Drogba can’t be true … but yeah, why not

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 2:46 PM GMT up reply actions  

Normalwise isn't a proper English word, but...

…don’t stop using it. “Normalerweise” is one of my favourite German words.

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Feb 21, 2012 2:59 PM GMT up reply actions  

Damn! The correct version would be

normally? But that sounds so boring and unfamiliar :P

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 3:02 PM GMT up reply actions  

Which is why I prefer normalwise.

Normalerweise is just too cool a word to translate correctly. : )

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Feb 21, 2012 3:06 PM GMT up reply actions  

On the other hand

this might be stemmed from the fact that German uses adverbs (and I mean adverbs that are marked specifically as adverbs, and not adjectives used as adverbs) differently than English that triggered a reaction in my brain that “Normally” can’t be the right word in the context

I’d try better next time :D

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 3:09 PM GMT up reply actions  

I'm not quite sure what you mean.

I’m afraid I never got that far in my German studies. : )

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Feb 21, 2012 3:14 PM GMT up reply actions  

You never learned that

in German there are no real differences between adverbs and adjectives? The same word can be used as an adverb or adjective … but you could form a special adverb with -weise (making normalerweise the adverb of normal). Those “special adverbs” are used in other context than “normal adverbs”

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Feb 21, 2012 3:17 PM GMT up reply actions  

Better than "normalcy"?

A word that sort of existed back when, but wasn’t really accepted as a word until after an American politician (later president) used it. However, our presidents making up words isn’t unheard of (I swear, I learned more strange things about the English language from Dubya than any of my professors).

by alynne4307 on Feb 21, 2012 3:52 PM GMT up reply actions  

Why do I feel like I just read the scouting report on the Souix they

gave Custer right before The Little Bighorn??

When I go to the press conference before the game, in my mind the game has already started.
Jose Mourinho

by cfc190five on Feb 21, 2012 3:31 PM GMT reply actions  

I am very nervous about this game. . .

I just hope AVB pulls it out of the bag and this give Chelsea the confidence to go forward and start a run of good performances (always the optimist)

Through the ups and the downs, in Chelsea I trust.

by ChelseaPIE on Feb 21, 2012 5:22 PM GMT reply actions  

thanks for this great article

i haven’t seen Napoli play so i really appreciate the depth of tactical analysis here. i gather that although Napoli has a really deadly counterattack, Chelsea still may have the guns to counter-act their counter-attack. can’t wait for the game.

put on your war paint fellas, this one’s gonna be real. UP BLUES!!!!

by dojothecat on Feb 21, 2012 6:45 PM GMT reply actions  

So much for good weather..

I checked last night and it just said “overcast”… was hoping things would dry up some. Let’s hope our guys came with their wellington-cleats!

by alynne4307 on Feb 21, 2012 6:48 PM GMT reply actions  

Weather is the great equalizer

Rain of course favors a more direct style, which could play into Napoli’s hands.

But yeah, better triple-check those cleats. A slip or two could spell an early end to us.

by DPeezy on Feb 21, 2012 6:54 PM GMT up reply actions  

I did

Pretty lucky on that. But good game that is.

by Marcus_Cfc on Feb 21, 2012 7:00 PM GMT via Android app up reply actions  

Yep.

Last minute free kick!

by DPeezy on Feb 21, 2012 7:01 PM GMT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Chelsea FC blog. Analysis, snark, despair, joy. And sometimes bears. We like David Luiz a lot.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Pictures from the victory parade
Chelsea_small
Sour Grapes.
Small
Keep calm, and trust Drogba

Recent FanPosts

Small
What few months we have in store at Chelsea
Wiggum_small
Off Topic Thread No. 12 - Safe Haven
Wiggum_small
WAGNH Introductions Thread: Take 2
Small
Drogba for Ballon d'Or?
Small
Right Backs
Small
Drogba is officially leaving. Your favourite Drogba moment?
2018381971-soccer-international-friendly-japan-v-england-upc-arena-s_small
My Chelsea FC Full Squad Report
Small
Cruyff: Nobody is happy that chelsea won
Rimbaud_small
Drogba's Agent Denies His Client's Interview
Small
Lampard to be all time top scorer.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

We Ain't Got No Facebook


Managers

Avatar_small Graham MacAree

3_small Stephen Schmidt

Authors

Dac_jel_7cm_small DPeezy

Image_small TPalmer

Wiggum_small Kevin Kostka

Cfc_small CareFreeChronic