Mata vs Swansea: Foul and Frustration
Juan Mata didn’t have such a great game against Swansea. He was anonymous for most of the game, especially the first half. This is partly because Swansea pressed really well – Dyer and Rangel on Chelsea’s left flank worked tirelessly to track and close down Mata and Cole. To be fair to our little Spanish magician, his teammates weren’t helping cause either. Not many Chelsea players came out of that game looking slightly positive.
However, he does have the duty to work hard for the team when the opposition has the upper hand. We signed him for his creativity (which we all love) but it is not asking too much to expect a little bit of defensive responsibility from him. I'm talking basic stuff -- like staying in front of your mark and not losing him. Swansea had a handful of goal-scoring opportunities in the first half and Mata's defensive frailty played a role in offering some of these changes on the plate for the opposition. Here, we will look at two such instances that took placed in the first half.
Rangel Owns Mata

Before we dive into this scenario, let’s just make one thing clear first. It is Mata’s duty as a wide man to mark opposition’s fullback on his flank – Rangel. It doesn’t matter if it’s 4-4-2 or 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1. If you are a winger (even if you are Lionel Messi), you mark opposition’s fullback. Period.
Now, in this particular case, Rangel receives a pass in his own half and Mata" tries" to press. Even from these two frames (the smaller ones above), you can see how easy it was for Rangel to go past Mata: all Rangel needed to do was take the first touch and wait for Mata to over-commit to one side. And for some weird reasons, Mata attempts to deny Rangel the pass back to his keeper or center backs (no danger zone) while opening up the path towards Chelsea’s half (danger zone). Rangel obligingly cuts onto his favorite right foot and pushes forward. No sweat.
Then, the Swansea fullback delivers an inviting long ball for Graham to chase. Cluster[fun] ensues: Chelsea needed to make three last-ditch blocks in order to deny Swansea the opening goal.
Of course, I'm not stupid enough to blame the whole thing on Mata. Cech and Ivanovic made sure the mess achieve its full potential. But he had a hand in this. More importantly, I think losing out to Rangel in this instance (along with Chelsea's lack of possession) frustrated Mata and led him to foul* the Swansea fullback as soon as he got the chance to, and Chelsea would have to pay a big price for that.
* So, the post should really be titled "Frustration and Foul" but that just doesn't sound right. There is a reason why Jane Austen went with "Sense and Sensibility" and not the other way around. But I digress.
Mata Fouls Rangel

This time, Rangel receives a pass back from his teammate in Chelsea's half. Mata is slightly in a central area but he rushes toward Rangel who, again, runs past Mata with ease. I think Mata kicked him like twice before he finally brought the guy down. It was a silly foul to give away, especially when Swansea had already came close (with Grahma's mis-shot) earlier in the game with a freekick around that very area. And we all know what happened next.

A nice looking freekick was floated in and Sinclair got on the end of a fortunate clearance. Goal.
Here's what I DON'T want you to take away from this post: I singled out Mata when almost the whole team is blameworthy for the dire performance against Swansea. No, I don't think it's all Mata's fault. But, I also think he had a responsibility which he didn't fulfill. When we don't have the ball, we need our players to be patient and composed in order to avoid do even more damage to ourselves. Mata came short in these cases. Yes, we love him but we can't let him get away with it when let us down.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Portos
I would like people to talk more about the problem of Miereles. Why do we play him? He has very little creativity, very little defensive presence. What is he good for? Absolutely nothing, but he is Portuguese so AVB obviously loves him, same as Bosingwa. Raul slows down the play, he is just awful, he gives away possession cheaply and really does nothing for the team. Would rather see Essien in that spot. On a similar note, what has happened to Malouda, is it his confidence. He was a killer last year, and now he just looks awful. Somebody please address what has happened to the once brilliant French ace! So, back to my point, until we get these two Portuguese off the team, Andre will continue to play them and they will continue to be AWFUL. Not worthy of Chelsea, not worthy of Notts Co for that matter!
Agreed on Raul
Excluding the part AVB plays him for being Portugese. I am quite pissed about Meireles more then I am pissed about Malouda.
In defense of Meireles playing
We are kind of struggling with injuried and fitness right now. I have to believe that Essien will get the start from now on while Ramires is out, but Essien was not fit to play 90 minutes last weekend. That being said, I would have rather seen Essien in there for the first 60 minutes or so and then just pulled off when he was tired.
I strongly dislike Meireles as well and think he is basically (this is bring dramatic) a combination of all the worst aspects of our center mids while not being better in any aspect. His passing is barely better than Ramires’s, but there isn’t even a comparison for pace/stamina between the two. He doesn’t make forward runs or finish as well as Lampard, yet is out of position just as much somehow. Romeu and Essien are both clearly better at defending than Meireles, yet they can both pass and move just as well as Meireles. Mikel is smarter and safer with the ball than Meireles and can play better defense, and is probably a better passer as well.
by AmericanChelseaFans on Feb 2, 2012 7:44 PM GMT up reply actions
Well, there are four Portuguese players on Chelsea
Two of which (Hilario and Ferreira) never play. Meireles is dropped on occaision and was excellent for the first few months of the season. Bosingwa is dropped frequently. While I’m frustrated by the usage patterns – not that the manager’s had much choice in who he uses recently – I’m not convinced at all by your argument as for the motivation.
by Graham MacAree on Feb 2, 2012 8:30 PM GMT up reply actions 1 recs
Meireles is better than Malouda at the moment.
According to who scored he had 4 key passes in the match compared to Malouda’s none, made the most match of the match (malouda have 46 to his 66) and 85%. He made 6 interceptions (highest on the pitch) to Romeu’s 2 and he had the most touches in the match.
I know he didn;t have a great match but statistically he ended up looking a lot better than a lot of the other players. And on a bad day. I think he’s a good player who started off better than I expected but has dipped recently but he’s still probably first choice in a midfield three with Ramires and Romeu.
Malouda was awful last year.
I know he had 14 goals last season but 6 of his goals came in the first five matches, in those 6-0, 4-0 type wins. 7 of his goals came in matches where we won by 3 or more. He’s a streaky player who has horrible droughts of form. He got us some game winners but he was incredibly anonymous for most of the season, and if he’d put in that type of performance without his blistering start when Chelsea trounced everyone for the first 5 weeks (and didn’t need his scoring), no one would consider it a good season.
I’ll always love him for his time under Hiddink and Ancelotti’s first few months. But he hasn’t been good since then.
How dare you accuse Mata of any wrongdoing?!
I’m glad you clarified in your last paragraph because I’m sure you would have gotten responses similar to my title if you hadn’t :)
But I do believe that Mata is starting to wear down and he is clearly not the same player he was at the beginning of the year. The smiles and carefree attitude we saw out of him the first couple months have been replaced with exasperated looks and frowns. He almost looks like he has given up some hope of the team turning around and is simply going through the motions more than being a spark of energy. I’ve paid special attention to his movement off the ball in the last couple of weeks and it has become more routine and slower than before. He used to make some of the sharpest/hardest cuts to and from the ball that I’ve seen, but now he simply drifts away after making a pass and jogs towards players more often than not.
It could also be a factor of teams having more scouting reports on him now and know how to guard against him better. Since they clearly don’t have to worry about our midfield and they know to just simply stand up Sturridge since he will not pass the majority of the time, that leaves Mata as the only true threat in the attacking third (since we’ve established Torres hasn’t been either).
I love Mata and I am not turning against him in any way, shape, or form. He’s had a couple of off games but until this last game, he is on the bottom of the list of players that hurt the team. As soon as the rest of the team decide they actually want to put forth some effort, I’m sure Mata will have a little more space and come back to his best form. Or at the very least, next year after we bring in a couple of world-class players to take some of the playmaking load off of his hobbit-sized shoulders.
by AmericanChelseaFans on Feb 2, 2012 7:58 PM GMT reply actions
americanchelseafan I agree with you absolutely.
juan mata is burning out as a result of being over used,the attackers would not utilise the passes effectively leading to goals and he had to create the goals himself. He changes positions sometimes to creates chances for Torres to finish off but will always be goal shy. I will not blame him for anything. Let all our strikers start living up to expectations.
by sop on Feb 2, 2012 9:17 PM GMT via mobile up reply actions
I suppose it's thirded then
I’d prefer someone a little faster on the wing anyway if possible
by Stephen Schmidt on Feb 2, 2012 10:51 PM GMT up reply actions
Yes
let’s send this as an official petition to AVB! I kid, I kid. But I kinda wish I wasnt.

by 














