Chelsea Hoping To Block Earls Court Development
Some interesting stuff is in the works regarding Chelsea's stadium move. For a long time, it's looked as thought Earls Court - for my money the most natural home of the Blues should we move from Stamford Bridge - was off-limits. Now, however, it seems as thought Chelsea are trying to sabotage the planned new development there. With the general plans for Capital & Counties' big project at Earls Court going up for approval at a Hammersmith and Fulham meeting today, the club has launched an objection to the scheme, hoping to block it before it begins:
The current applications fail to take advantage of the potential for a new strategic leisure, cultural and visitor attraction, such as might be provided by a new stadium with conference and exhibition spaces. (We) therefore consider the applications premature in advance of the EC&WKOA SPD and have requested that any decisions on the applications are deferred until the SPD has been adopted.
-Source: CoStar news.
So that's pretty interesting. My gut feeling is that Chelsea are probably out of luck here - the planners have given their recommendation that the original project be allowed to proceed, but it's nice to see the club be so aggressive about going after an area that could really be a great site for them. Earls Court is almost certainly a better place for Chelsea than Battersea, which is south of the Thames, and so the Blues should be fighting tooth and claw to get a stadium built there.
Remember that under the Financial Fair Play rules, Chelsea can vastly increase their revenues by moving into a new arena without actually impacting their relevant expenses, so a move away from Stamford Bridge is looking like an excellent solution to any money problems we may have. There was, of course, plenty of controversy as the team tried to buy out the Chelsea Pitch Owners last autumn, with many fearing the club might escape the area altogether, so the fact that the team is taking nearby sites so seriously for a proposed move is fantastic.
Hopefully the objection to the current plan for Earls Court holds. Why have a bunch of silly overpriced townhouses when you could have a stadium!
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Would be nice if this objection were sustained
As much as I would love a Fortress at Battersea, it’s hard not to see Earl’s Court as a better, more ideal option.
I wouldn't be so sure it's impossible for us.
I’ve heard there are problems behind the scenes with the deal, and that Boris would prefer a stadium there. It’s probably beyond us, but there’s a decent chance we’d get to stick our stadium there.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
I didn't say anything like 'impossible'
by Graham MacAree on Feb 16, 2012 8:24 PM GMT up reply actions
That wasn't directed at you specifically.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Feb 16, 2012 8:28 PM GMT up reply actions
Not sure entirely how relevant it is that Boris wants a stadium there
From what I can gather, the majority of the world is just trying to pretend that he doesn’t exist.
There's some part of the deal that's sort of in trouble, and needs to be done soon, lest...
…the Mayor’s office jump in and take over the deal.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Feb 16, 2012 9:52 PM GMT up reply actions















