Should Chelsea go after Sneijder?

Sorry this is the first time I've created a fanpost so if the formatting sucks, I apologize.

I was wondering if there was a way where Chelsea could actually afford Sneijder and his wages. Inter must hate paying his wages and getting nothing out of him. It's clear that Raneri doesn't need Sneijder and maybe doesn't even want him. Sneijder has played 7 Serie A games this season and with Inter now in 5th it seems that Raneri is going to be at Inter for a couple of seasons (but you never know with football these days). I'm sure Raneri would rather use Sneijder's wages on a couple of different players especially with a rapidly aging squad. So...

Say Chelsea takes Sneijder and Inter takes Malouda. Clearly Sneijder is the better player but Inter get to dump his salary and even get a good squad player in return. Now this nothing compared to 40M euros they are said to hav wanted from City this summer but they are losing the upper hand (and money) every day Sneijder sits on their bench. Realistically Chelsea will need to kick in some transfer fee but for right now let's set that aside.

Sneijder makes ~£190k per week (£9.88M per year) and Malouda makes £3M a year in wages or ~£58k per week. The £132k difference is about £7M per year which is a BIG difference but not awful if we pay nothing on a transfer fee.

If we were to get Sneijder I'm assuming we will have to keep him for the rest of his contract*. According to Wiki, Sneijder signed a 5 year contract taking him to 2015. He signed the current deal October 2010 but it says the deal goes until 2015 so I assume it isn't a 4.5 year long deal ending in the middle of a season but instead they tore up the 2010-2011 deal and started with 2010-11 being year 1 of the new five year deal, 11-12 as year 2, 12-13 as year 3, 13-14 as year 4 and 14-15 as year 5. It's currently year 2 so if we get him this summer we'd be on the hook for three seasons. Malouda only has one more year on his deal so we'd be paying all of Sneijder's contract for two seasons and the Sneijder minus Malouda contract for one. That means Sneijder would still cost us about £26M for three years even on a free transfer. Just for comparison though, Mata cost us £23.5M for only the transfer fee. I assume he makes about the same if not more than Malouda so if I guess that Mata makes £3.5M per season meaning that over 5 years Mata will cost Chelsea £41M over his 5 seasons. Sneijder though is only would have three years left so 3/5 of £41 is £24.6M or just £1.4M less than Sneijder on a free deal. That doesn't seem horrible. However, as I said above getting Snijder for just Malouda seems unlikely especially a)since they asked for 40M euros this summer and b) we'd be dumping Malouda's contract on Inter to help make Sneijder cheaper, not trading them a good player instead of a transfer fee. If say inter offered us the above deal but with a £20M transfer fee attacked Sneijder would cost us £46M over three seasons. Now, Chelsea has a handful of players on the final year(s) of their contracts so maybe we take on Sneijder as a last chance to win with this squad and talk Drogba into coming back for a final year and such. I guess the question comes down to 1) how low can we get Inter's transfer fee down too (anything near £15m which is about what Inter paid Real Madrid for I'd say yes), 2) are Drogba, Torres, Lampard, Cole, Cech, Terry, and Essien still good enough that adding someone of Sneijder's quality will actually make a difference (would adding Sneijder actually give us a chance in England/UEFA) and 3) would signing Sneijder help us keep Drogba? If we're going to lose him to China or somewhere else than we'd need to sign a striker meaning unless we sign someone cheap (which I want but seems un-Chelsea like) than we'd have already blown the budget and that's before adding Sneijder and his ridiculous weekly wages. Falcao, Soldado, Villa, Cavani, Tevez, Gameiro, Rossi, and Hulk will all cost a fortune meaning the hopes of getting Sneijder are zero.

*Which seems likely since only about 6 teams can afford in the first place, Madrid and Barca don't need him (already have backups in Kaka and Cesc/Thiago/Villa), I don't see Senijder in Malaga or playing in Ligue 1 for PSG, leaving us, Man City and maybe a Russian team or a middle eastern team but I just don't see Sneijder not in England, Italy or Spain. City could use Sneijder but I don't see us selling him within the EPL so that'd rule them out. Meaning if we bought Sneijder he's here until the contract ends unless he renegotiates.