Eduardo Vargas' agent explains the decision to move to Napoli
According to Sky Sports, the agent for Eduardo Vargas has helped to explain his client's decision to join our next opponent in the Champions League as opposed to making the move to the Bridge. According to Christian Ogalde:
The choice must not be dictated only by economic reasons or the club's coat of arms but also by the possibility to grow and show qualities. The interest of Chelsea? We would have been proud of his move to the Blues and we certainly would have got a higher wage, but Napoli was the best solution for everyone. The club were determined and showed us that they strongly believe in the potential of the boy, who can express his talent in the Azzurri shirt.
It certainly sounds as if Vargas was more concerned about assuring he'd get plenty of playing time rather than immediately joining a top European club, and at this point is his career I can't say that's really a bad decision. As much as I'd have loved to have seen Vargas in our shade of blue, Napoli is certainly a good team in a good league where he'll likely have an easier time ensuring himself plenty of playing time to continue his development. It also potentially makes losing one of their top players over the summer more palatable for Napoli, so I'd expect to see plenty of speculation regarding Hamsik and Cavani in the coming months. Enjoy Napoli Eduardo, just don't do anything fantastic against us.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Was really keen to see him playing for us
But I can’t begrudge him this decision. I wouldn’t be surprised if he starts for them immediately, since it seems likely Hamsik will move.
He is pretty similar to Sturridge except....
Sturridge has done it against enormously better opposition.
Not as fast
as Danny and by a long way too. Also he’s probably more direct but the sad thing is we would have been able touse him right away but seeing the likes of Josh and Lukaku never getting a chances has, yet again, killed us when trying for younger talent. If we won’t play our best prospect for an eternity and won’t play a £18million pound signing why would other kids think they’d be trusted. We’re killing ourselves with our hopeless youth system. We never give anyone a chance.
Lol CHILDREN rarely get to start/even play at the highest level of club football..
Name one teenager that is the same age or younger than J-Mac and gets more play time at Barca, Real, Bayern, Man-U, Man C, Arsenal, Inter, AC Milan, etc… I’d say 21 is when you’ve learned enough to play with the big boys full time.
by Nikeamah Dabre on Jan 7, 2012 5:56 PM GMT up reply actions
Walcott, Rooney Fabregas off the top of my head
Wilshere was 19 for Arsenal so I guess that doesn’t count.
Oh and I think J-Mac is older than Lukaku too....
Have you heard anything about Jack Cork? lol
by Nikeamah Dabre on Jan 7, 2012 5:58 PM GMT up reply actions
Well...
I hope he knows he missed out, good luck trying to get in the starting line up for Napoli…
by CHELSEAxFCxFOREVER on Jan 8, 2012 2:32 AM GMT reply actions
With Lavezzi injured for a month?
Beating out Goran Pandev isn’t going to be too hard.
by Graham MacAree on Jan 8, 2012 12:46 PM GMT up reply actions

by 













