Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Relegation Simulation: Rewriting College Football History

Chelsea FC Transfer Rumours: Blues Moving In On Eden Hazard

Photo

When you write about football rumours, there are some you simply discard straight away. You know the source is unreliable and the speculation contained therein fanciful. There are some you consider and then discard, and then next on the transfer rumour spectrum are those you consider highly likely to be false but just so interesting that they get written about anyway. That last category is where I'm filing the Daily Mail and the latest round of Eden Hazard speculation.

Star-divide

What have everyone's favourite gossip rag got to say about the little Belgian winger? I'm just gonna go ahead and quote it, because paraphrasing the rumour would make me feel even more dirty than writing this post in the first place:

Chelsea are closing on a deal for Lille’s Eden Hazard amid renewed competition from Real Madrid.

Sportsmail revealed at the weekend that Hazard’s agent expected an offer of around £25million to come from Stamford Bridge for the Belgian playmaker, and now sources at Lille believe the player has provisionally agreed terms with Chelsea.

That's hardly decisive language from the Mail, but it's still very interesting. If there's even a 20% chance that it's true, we should get a little bit excited about it, and say what you will about the tabloids, they rarely flat-out make stuff up. The Mail are essentially insisting that Chelsea's pursuit of Hazard this January is real and, what's more, possible.

I'm not really sure what to make of that. There are several boundaries in the way of a sale. Lille's qualification for the Champions League next season is still in major doubt - right now they're third in the table behind Paris Saint-Germain and Montpellier, a position which would see them safe, but only two points separate the defending Champions and Marseille in sixth place. Losing Hazard would make it that much more difficult for Lille to make it back to next year's group stages.

Furthermore, Hazard's team already played in this year's tournament, although they finished (disappointingly) at the bottom of Group B. That means that he'd be ineligible to feature for Chelsea in Europe for the remainder of the year. While important, this shouldn't actually be a major consideration. At this point the Blues should consider European glory a secondary target at best and, like Lille, must focus on returning to next year's group stages. Still, better to prioritse players who aren't cup-tied over those who are.

Finally, there's a question of price. It's pretty obvious that Hazard would cost a lot of money and less clear that Chelsea would be willing to spend so much. Frankly, the only people who know what kind of budget the club is playing with work for the club, and it's impossible at this point to know whether Chelsea are serious about a big target until we actually hear that a bid was lodged. So far that's not been true of Hazard.

All the same, this is a fun transfer rumour. Although the 21-year-old probably isn't the magic bullet he's being treated like, he's still a fine player who would give Chelsea all sorts of options to play with. The fact that we're being linked with a guy valued by his club at €40M is far sexier than the other long-running saga we've gotten to play with this winter in new number 24 Gary Cahill, and so it's natural to get drawn in. Is this going to happen? Probably not, but you never know. This time last year Fernando Torres wasn't even on our radar.

Comment 121 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from We Ain't Got No History

Around SB Nation

Comments

Display:

I wouldn't expect them to

If this is legitimate, it’s the first dance in the negotiations.

by Graham MacAree on Jan 17, 2012 1:34 AM GMT up reply actions  

We will lose that one without throwing money at him.

He wants to go to Madrid, I believe.

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 2:11 AM GMT up reply actions  

I am not denying this is true

as much as I don’t get it if it is. Why go to a top club where you may ride the bench often, when you can go to a top club and be a star in your position, almost uncontested for the spot? I mean, I know he isn’t guaranteed success or failure at either club, but it’s not like they’re hurting for him at Madrid. We could certainly use a true winger and free up Mata for the CAM role.

by alynne4307 on Jan 17, 2012 2:29 AM GMT up reply actions  

super ambition?

very confident in his ability? loves the challenge?

by Sabrina Dessipe on Jan 17, 2012 2:33 AM GMT up reply actions  

Only chance for Eden is to strike now

One bid, right on the £33million buy out, and talk him into coming. Tell him how he’s the bedrock with Mata of a Chelsea to rival barca and real and surpass City. Tell him the plan, tell him who will follow and that we simply MUST haveb him NOW, that we don’t want to wait and will prioritise him over non CL tied players because we want him that much. Woo him to death otherwise concede defeat and don’t go for him and show us up.

Tell him he could get injured, could have a mare in the Euros etc, etc ruining a summer move and that we’re there and there now, will reinvest and he’s more chancve of being a Chelsea legend with out younger history of success than one of many at the other clubs who may or may not come calling. Tat’s our chance of getting him and now is as good as summer when his price is already SET.

He offers AVB a whole load of tactical and formation freedom and negates the immediate need for a reative midfield signing as Mata could move inside and we could watch how Josh gets on at Swansea before either dabbling again in the summer or not having to and getting a RB etc. Hazard makes a lot of sense tactically, talent wise and fits the age range of AVB’s signing profile perfectly and he’s also a great talent now with every chance of getting a whole lot better.

I’m not saying we have to buy him(I would myself as anyone else as good would cost a lot more and as he’s young it’s nowhere near the risk Torres was as he (Eden) would be worth something to sell on even if he didn’t light up the EPL.

Only issue is the CL thing but, as he’d be the same price in summer why not now? I hope we do but as we now sign Cahill type trash I worry we won’t see anything exciting wanting to come again. I’m bi polar mind, so I do swing a bit!

by mastiffchild on Jan 17, 2012 3:41 AM GMT up reply actions  

I heard Messi has like a twelve euro buyout, but nobody...

…knows bothered to check.

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 4:19 AM GMT up reply actions  

Argh!

Pick one of: “…has bothered to check.” and “…knows about it.”

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 4:20 AM GMT up reply actions  

If he had a 12€ buyout

then I believe there is an built-in compensation estimated to be around € 600m for Barca once this clause is triggered – so it could even be!

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Jan 17, 2012 10:30 AM GMT up reply actions  

He need look no further than who sits on Real's bench

to see that there is a fine line between confidence and overconfidence that could see a plateau in his career.

Being really ambitious doesn’t always make for the best career decisions… just ask our friend Torres (amidst all the recent speculation that he is now looking to leave or Chelsea is looking to be rid of him). ;)

by alynne4307 on Jan 17, 2012 4:35 PM GMT up reply actions  

Torres however is a really bad example

if it’s about guys who think they are future world football superstars

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Jan 17, 2012 4:49 PM GMT up reply actions  

CR7 is a bad example

If your talking about overly ambitious players that went for the big move to the biggest club only fail and fall into obscurity, he is still the second best player in the world and scoring for fun, he is the star of a better team than utd, gets to live in Madrid instead of Manchester and makes a lot more money. The only downside he has faced is lack over trophies although since he left he has won 1 spanish cup, utd won 1 league nd da carling cup but utd don’t have compete with Barcelona in every competition, but we do have plenty of evidence to suggest they wouldn’t fare too well. A better example would be Benzema who, despite doing well this year, turned down offers from all the top clubs in Europe to join Madrid only to spend 2 years picking splinters from his backside!

by conorjmartin on Jan 17, 2012 8:21 PM GMT up reply actions  

I guess if people dream

and the emphasis is on “dream” about moving to a big club then they don’t think too much about ending up on the bench; somewhat understandable that young prospects think of themselves being good enough to get a decent starting position. I can’t say that about Belgian players – since Chelsea seemingly doesn’t have a bad reputation in Belgium I believe but in most areas in Europe Chelsea in reputation equals the abyss. Maybe this is something what they are fearing about

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Jan 17, 2012 10:29 AM GMT up reply actions  

If we could get him for 40m or less this would be the best news.

But if this is true, does that call into question the reliability of the Jovetic rumours? Could we possibly be in for both of them?

by gold_e on Jan 17, 2012 1:36 AM GMT reply actions  

Do the existence of both rumours lend credence to each other?

I wouldn’t think so, but they sort of do. On one hand, both could easily be false, but they could both be Plans A and 2.

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 1:44 AM GMT up reply actions  

Yes, as does the Vargas rejection

The team is pretty clearly looking for some reinforcement on the wings. That said… well, knowing what a team wants makes it easier to make up a plausible-sounding transfer rumour

by Graham MacAree on Jan 17, 2012 1:45 AM GMT up reply actions  

If that's the case, at least they seem to be making up sensible rumors now

Far better than what we’ve seen in years past that would link us to Ribery or Pedro

by Stephen Schmidt on Jan 17, 2012 1:47 AM GMT up reply actions  

Most bizarre thing was

even after Ribery signed a new contract and vowed to stay at Bayern for the rest of his career (and finally managed to learn German, by the way) we were still linked to him with astronomical figures. Maybe it’s a running gag, who knows

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Jan 17, 2012 10:32 AM GMT up reply actions  

That's what I hate about transfer rumours.

Context makes them both more plausible and easier to create from nothing. With Hazard, though, it does seem as if the big players are circling.

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 1:48 AM GMT up reply actions  

First Jovetic,

now more Hazard material? I suppose now that there’s only two weeks left and Cahill has been completed, it’s time for some exciting (and probably untrue) rumors.

That being said, if we were to tie up a deal for either one of these two players, I would be immensely happy.

by Joe DelGreco on Jan 17, 2012 1:42 AM GMT reply actions  

I'm in the same boat as you

I feel pretty obligated to keep everyone updated and throw my thoughts into the mix, but I’m not especially hopeful of a major move

by Graham MacAree on Jan 17, 2012 1:44 AM GMT up reply actions  

I have a feeling

Hazard will be the one other signing AVB was mentioning. We could finish the De Bruyne deal as well I guess.

by Dlewis on Jan 17, 2012 3:30 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

Why?

Potential?

by Dlewis on Jan 17, 2012 3:40 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

I like his overall game a little more

Personal preference on that, but I’ve always had a soft spot for guys that are ridiculously fast. I just love super fast counter attacking play more than the Barca style short passing game, thus my fascination with the Nigerian youth teams.

by Stephen Schmidt on Jan 17, 2012 3:47 AM GMT up reply actions  

I would tend to agree, but I think Danny and Ramires give us enough...

…pace on the counter to make Hazard an excellent option. You could always have more though, and we could always use better passing than our two sprinters.

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 3:50 AM GMT up reply actions  

Thing is, Moura can pass as well

He’s certainly not as refined as Hazard right now, but it’s not a large gap at all.

by Stephen Schmidt on Jan 17, 2012 3:52 AM GMT up reply actions  

I meant to say...

…better passing on the counter

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 3:54 AM GMT up reply actions  

Ah yes...

for some reason I read Moura and thought Gaston Ramirez for some reason. Thanks.

In regards to Moura vs. Hazard: 6 one, half dozen the other. I’d kill to see either in a Chelsea kit

by Joe DelGreco on Jan 17, 2012 3:54 AM GMT up reply actions  

It's really a question of taste.

I think either would immediately make us a better team.

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 3:55 AM GMT up reply actions  

It's also a matter of positioning

Hazard would do wonders for our wings while Lucas might work a little better of were going to put someone behind the strikers.

by Dlewis on Jan 17, 2012 4:36 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

i reckon it might be easier to land moura

plus he is younger and not CL tied, but he could be more pricey

by blue_is_the_colour on Jan 17, 2012 6:14 AM GMT up reply actions  

I'd prefer moura too

stephen I think i’ll go with you on moura,lets unravel him in EPL to the surprise of all. He is a future star,I can’t wait to have him put on chelsea jersey.

by sop on Jan 17, 2012 10:42 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

I'd prefer moura too

stephen I think i’ll go with you on moura,lets unravel him in EPL to the surprise of all. He is a future star,I can’t wait to have him put on chelsea jersey.

by sop on Jan 17, 2012 10:42 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

I'd prefer moura too

stephen I think i’ll go with you on moura,lets unravel him in EPL to the surprise of all. He is a future star,I can’t wait to have him put on chelsea jersey.

by sop on Jan 17, 2012 10:42 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

I'd prefer moura too

stephen I think i’ll go with you on moura,lets unravel him in EPL to the surprise of all. He is a future star,I can’t wait to have him put on chelsea jersey.

by sop on Jan 17, 2012 10:43 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

Dan Levene tweeted this

“A flurry of late gossip suggesting Eden Hazard may be on his way to Chelsea. One to look into tomorrow. Watch this space.”

by cmi318 on Jan 17, 2012 2:09 AM GMT reply actions  

True...

but unfortunately that has never stopped me from pouring over rumours when I hear one that I’d like to be true.

by Joe DelGreco on Jan 17, 2012 2:19 AM GMT up reply actions  

just imagine this team:
Cech
Ivanovic—-Cahill—-Terry—-Cole
Ramires——Romeu——-Essien
Hazard———-Sturridge——-Mata

by Berisso Brizzy on Jan 17, 2012 2:19 AM GMT reply actions  

How about...

Cech
Ivanovic—————DL—————Terry————Cole
-——————-Ramires———Romeu
Sturridge———————-Mata———————-Hazard
-————————————Torres

or…

Hazard—————————Mata———————-Jovetic
-———————————Sturridge

Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!

by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 2:26 AM GMT up reply actions  

Yes please!

drool

Wait what about our newest signing Gary?

by ChelseaDC on Jan 17, 2012 3:27 AM GMT up reply actions  

oh my....

Hazard and Azpilicueta…all we need

by Dochinzo on Jan 17, 2012 3:50 AM GMT up reply actions  

I shouldn't be saying anything like this now I know

so don’t beat me up – but my knees are mellowing when I try to imagine how Cahill manages to step into Terry’s big big shoes to fill :(

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Jan 17, 2012 10:41 AM GMT up reply actions  

That

looks eerily like my squad on FIFA. Just throw in Hulk, who was another transfer target

by jtam on Jan 17, 2012 3:27 AM GMT reply actions  

With that buyout clause

Hulk might never leave Porto. Their president doesn’t know what the term “negotiation” means.

by Dlewis on Jan 17, 2012 3:47 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

True

Or might be he knows – and especially that’s why he inserted that buyout clause into Hulk’s contract

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Jan 17, 2012 10:43 AM GMT up reply actions  

Martin Lipton has said

in an interview to TNC that Lille are trying to create a market and there is nothing concrete between us & Lille over Hazard. Chelsea are interested but a move in winter seems highly unlikely.

He also expects Chelsea’s second signing to be Azpilicueta(as AVB wants to replace Bosingwa) or maybe a striker…
Now what to make of that??

Also saw a rumor linking us to Lucas Barrios…

by msreya on Jan 17, 2012 3:48 AM GMT via mobile reply actions  

Lucas Barrios?

Oh good…another misfiring striker is EXACTLY what we need.

by DPeezy on Jan 17, 2012 4:19 AM GMT up reply actions  

Striker crisis worldwide

Sounds good

Might also be the reason for inflated prices once “striker” is mentioned

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Jan 17, 2012 10:44 AM GMT up reply actions  

Agreed

Weird rumor

by Dlewis on Jan 17, 2012 4:38 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions  

This is irresponsible reporting from the Daily Mail – usually an excellent journalistic publication (sarcasm) – With the outrageous amount of money Chelsea have spent they cannot really buy any expensive players in this window if they are to comply with Financial Fair Play. Its their own fault for overreacting and buying Torres and wasting all that money on David Luiz . I am sorry, but he is vastly overrated.

by astrotrain on Jan 17, 2012 1:54 PM GMT reply actions  

Re-read the rules of FFP

And then realize that it has little effect on our previous purchases.

by cwel87 on Jan 17, 2012 2:04 PM GMT up reply actions  

I think we're in a decent financial position at the moment.

I think we could afford a £20mil player without disturbing FFP too much. Also we need to get up to third place far more urgently than we need to control our spending.

by Famouscfc on Jan 17, 2012 2:24 PM GMT up reply actions  

Captain we found one!

Wasting money on David Luiz. Thanks for the laugh this morning.

by DPeezy on Jan 17, 2012 4:53 PM GMT up reply actions  

I think I'd still prefer Gotze, if we're talking about Cup-tied young talents

But that’s just really splitting hairs; either this transfer window would be incredible. And yet, that’s why I still find myself splitting hairs – I don’t think either will be available until the summer window at the earliest, regardless of what The Daily Mail tells us!

by cwel87 on Jan 17, 2012 2:08 PM GMT reply actions  

Even I prefer Gotze

Though I prefer him even over Messi and Pedro

by Archit Arya on Jan 17, 2012 2:28 PM GMT up reply actions  

When Alexis Sanchez plays at your position

You won’t be able to show much.

1970 - 1984 - 2010

"Vamos Fluzão, vamos ganhar
Eu sou do clube tantas vezes campeão!
Vim pra torcer, vim pra gritar
E por você a vida inteira vou cantar!"

by trOOly on Jan 17, 2012 4:18 PM GMT up reply actions  

You could argue that Pedro has never really been "very good" ever

He was just surrounded by unbelievable talent. I’m pretty sure I could’ve scored a hatful with Messi, Iniesta, et al. buzzing around me, too. (Even without the benefit of many years of training at La Masia.)

by DPeezy on Jan 17, 2012 4:56 PM GMT up reply actions  

That I'd like to see,

no kidding ;)

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Jan 17, 2012 4:57 PM GMT up reply actions  

Yeah, you and me both.

Where’s a Barca scout when you need a one?! And a time machine, to roll back about 15 years…

by DPeezy on Jan 17, 2012 5:02 PM GMT up reply actions  

I'd even break the bank for it when Barca come knocking out Leverkusen and

you were part of that team! Get the time machine started! Didn’t you say in another thread you had one?

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Jan 17, 2012 5:06 PM GMT up reply actions  

Yep, time vortex

But so far it only works for inanimate objects. Too much entropy in a human being to get it locked down. Stupid 21st century technology!

by DPeezy on Jan 17, 2012 6:18 PM GMT up reply actions  

So sad!

How would it look when you play between Andres and Messi? LIke those guys and girls in the PS3 spots during the CL coverages?

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Jan 17, 2012 7:59 PM GMT up reply actions  

I doubt this is true

But if it is, I won’t complain about it.

1970 - 1984 - 2010

"Vamos Fluzão, vamos ganhar
Eu sou do clube tantas vezes campeão!
Vim pra torcer, vim pra gritar
E por você a vida inteira vou cantar!"

by trOOly on Jan 17, 2012 4:19 PM GMT reply actions  

Via the Twitters (Ian McGarry of BBC Radio 5Live)

“Eden Hazard expects an agreement to be reached with #CFC for his transfer this week. Personal terms are close to completion. Fee approx 28m€”

https://twitter.com/garbosj/statuses/159267170713481217

by ChelseaDC on Jan 17, 2012 4:53 PM GMT reply actions  

28m?

And €, too? Uuuuh. OK. Exiting

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Jan 17, 2012 4:55 PM GMT up reply actions  

And, of course, he could very well have just made it up

As somebody on there pointed out, McGarry had Hiddink in as DoF with Van Basten as coach.

Oopsies.

by DPeezy on Jan 17, 2012 4:58 PM GMT up reply actions  

Yes, yes...

I tend to agree. The fee is crazy low – esp if in euros. I’m just here to pass things along. :-D

by ChelseaDC on Jan 17, 2012 5:01 PM GMT up reply actions  

Even if it were GBP

it’s still low yeah low … € 33m that would be

Tor ilisar'thera'nal!

by Maiev on Jan 17, 2012 5:08 PM GMT up reply actions  

Guys it's TWITTER OFFICIAL!!!

Lille would be stupid to sell at that price they could get more.

by Sabrina Dessipe on Jan 17, 2012 5:01 PM GMT up reply actions  

Try and not get excited

But it’s impossible not to. I can’t imagine it’d be that cheap or this easy… No one else has tried a bid yet. Surely he would want to see all the offers from the big teams? Not just go alright Chelsea it is. Anyway common sense PLEASE BE TRUE!!!

by Famouscfc on Jan 17, 2012 5:16 PM GMT up reply actions  

That’s utterly bogus..price is waaaaaaaaaaaaay too low. Plus. why would you go to Chelsea when Real madrid are also after him..and he would start at Real Madrid…

by astrotrain on Jan 17, 2012 5:56 PM GMT reply actions  

No he wouldn't

Eden Hazard is not starting over Angel di Maria or Cristiano Ronaldo

by Graham MacAree on Jan 17, 2012 6:01 PM GMT up reply actions  

If I was the manager he would be starting over Ronaldo

But under Mourinho he wont start.If I was the manager Ronaldo would be rotting on the bench

by Archit Arya on Jan 17, 2012 6:36 PM GMT up reply actions  

Nobody would leave Ronaldo on the bench

He is STILL the second best player in the world.

by Avinash Mohan on Jan 17, 2012 8:51 PM GMT up reply actions  

get it done.

Hazard to Chelsea though for 27 mill + Kalou and Lukaku (on loan)

by CardinaLnGold on Jan 17, 2012 6:36 PM GMT reply actions  

hmmm

replace lukaku with mikel, who’s become surplus to requirements with essien and romeu. plus i think raul and rami are capable of playing the dm or deep lying playmaker.

by CardinaLnGold on Jan 17, 2012 6:53 PM GMT up reply actions  

I hate these rumours

Everyone is reporting we’re in for him and that a deal should be completed this month. I can’t tell if it’s one where there is a mall amount of truth that everyones jumped on but wont happen or one where everyone’s reporting it and both clubs deny it only for it to end up happening.

by Famouscfc on Jan 17, 2012 9:22 PM GMT reply actions  

to be honest

i don’t think its out of the realm of possibility. As Graham said, last year, who would’ve thought we would get Torres AND Luiz on the last day of the transfer window. Would anyone really be surprised if we got Hazard and Azpilicueta.

by CardinaLnGold on Jan 17, 2012 10:05 PM GMT up reply actions  

I would be surprised if we got both.

Less if we got Hazard. If the club actually genuinely want him I’m pretty sure we’d get him. I think we’d beat Real off with the prospect of playing time and I can’t see any other club in England competing with us. United can’t/wont compete with us financially, Arsenal are you know and Liverpool are rubbish. Tottenham don;t have enough money and too many players like him.

If he comes here he’ll be promised a starting position and he will have a team that suits him. An Attacking midfield trio of Danny, Mata and Hazard would be amazing. All three could swap position and cause havoc for defenders and then they have Torres to deal with.

by Famouscfc on Jan 18, 2012 3:45 PM GMT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Chelsea FC blog. Analysis, snark, despair, joy. And sometimes bears. We like David Luiz a lot.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

N749860957_555064_4156_small
Is John Terry still Chelsea's best central defender?
1419410_700b_small
Hello, Frank Lampard speaking.
Wiggum_small
WAGNH Introductions Thread: Take 2
Wiggum_small
Off Topic Thread No. 11 - Laser Power
248320-watch-highlights-of-chelsea-vs-napoli-in-the-champions-league_1__small
Kalou will go to Feyenoord this summer
Ramires1_2497015_small
Favorite Jersey/Kit?
Vastleggen_in_volledig_scherm_25-2-2013_small
Fabio Capello - The Next Chelsea Manager?
Small
Right back situation
Small
Honigstein betrays his country with excellent article on how to beat Bayern Munich
Wiggum_small
Off Topic Thread No. 10 - Stasis

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

We Ain't Got No Facebook


Managers

Avatar_small Graham MacAree

3_small Stephen Schmidt

Authors

Dac_jel_7cm_small DPeezy

Image_small TPalmer

Wiggum_small Kevin Kostka

Cfc_small CareFreeChronic