Chelsea FC Transfer Rumours: Blues Moving In On Eden Hazard
When you write about football rumours, there are some you simply discard straight away. You know the source is unreliable and the speculation contained therein fanciful. There are some you consider and then discard, and then next on the transfer rumour spectrum are those you consider highly likely to be false but just so interesting that they get written about anyway. That last category is where I'm filing the Daily Mail and the latest round of Eden Hazard speculation.
What have everyone's favourite gossip rag got to say about the little Belgian winger? I'm just gonna go ahead and quote it, because paraphrasing the rumour would make me feel even more dirty than writing this post in the first place:
Chelsea are closing on a deal for Lille’s Eden Hazard amid renewed competition from Real Madrid.
Sportsmail revealed at the weekend that Hazard’s agent expected an offer of around £25million to come from Stamford Bridge for the Belgian playmaker, and now sources at Lille believe the player has provisionally agreed terms with Chelsea.
That's hardly decisive language from the Mail, but it's still very interesting. If there's even a 20% chance that it's true, we should get a little bit excited about it, and say what you will about the tabloids, they rarely flat-out make stuff up. The Mail are essentially insisting that Chelsea's pursuit of Hazard this January is real and, what's more, possible.
I'm not really sure what to make of that. There are several boundaries in the way of a sale. Lille's qualification for the Champions League next season is still in major doubt - right now they're third in the table behind Paris Saint-Germain and Montpellier, a position which would see them safe, but only two points separate the defending Champions and Marseille in sixth place. Losing Hazard would make it that much more difficult for Lille to make it back to next year's group stages.
Furthermore, Hazard's team already played in this year's tournament, although they finished (disappointingly) at the bottom of Group B. That means that he'd be ineligible to feature for Chelsea in Europe for the remainder of the year. While important, this shouldn't actually be a major consideration. At this point the Blues should consider European glory a secondary target at best and, like Lille, must focus on returning to next year's group stages. Still, better to prioritse players who aren't cup-tied over those who are.
Finally, there's a question of price. It's pretty obvious that Hazard would cost a lot of money and less clear that Chelsea would be willing to spend so much. Frankly, the only people who know what kind of budget the club is playing with work for the club, and it's impossible at this point to know whether Chelsea are serious about a big target until we actually hear that a bid was lodged. So far that's not been true of Hazard.
All the same, this is a fun transfer rumour. Although the 21-year-old probably isn't the magic bullet he's being treated like, he's still a fine player who would give Chelsea all sorts of options to play with. The fact that we're being linked with a guy valued by his club at €40M is far sexier than the other long-running saga we've gotten to play with this winter in new number 24 Gary Cahill, and so it's natural to get drawn in. Is this going to happen? Probably not, but you never know. This time last year Fernando Torres wasn't even on our radar.
121 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
They will never acceot £25 million anyways...
by el chelsea fuerte on Jan 17, 2012 1:31 AM GMT reply actions
I wouldn't expect them to
If this is legitimate, it’s the first dance in the negotiations.
by Graham MacAree on Jan 17, 2012 1:34 AM GMT up reply actions
And supposedly Mou is trying to muscle in on this as well..
…so there’s that. Bidding war anyone? heh
Follow me on twitter@PrixFixeOnline
Staff writer for Managing Madrid & Sounder At Heart
by Timm Higgins on Jan 17, 2012 2:11 AM GMT up reply actions
We will lose that one without throwing money at him.
He wants to go to Madrid, I believe.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 2:11 AM GMT up reply actions
I am not denying this is true
as much as I don’t get it if it is. Why go to a top club where you may ride the bench often, when you can go to a top club and be a star in your position, almost uncontested for the spot? I mean, I know he isn’t guaranteed success or failure at either club, but it’s not like they’re hurting for him at Madrid. We could certainly use a true winger and free up Mata for the CAM role.
super ambition?
very confident in his ability? loves the challenge?
by Sabrina Dessipe on Jan 17, 2012 2:33 AM GMT up reply actions
Only chance for Eden is to strike now
One bid, right on the £33million buy out, and talk him into coming. Tell him how he’s the bedrock with Mata of a Chelsea to rival barca and real and surpass City. Tell him the plan, tell him who will follow and that we simply MUST haveb him NOW, that we don’t want to wait and will prioritise him over non CL tied players because we want him that much. Woo him to death otherwise concede defeat and don’t go for him and show us up.
Tell him he could get injured, could have a mare in the Euros etc, etc ruining a summer move and that we’re there and there now, will reinvest and he’s more chancve of being a Chelsea legend with out younger history of success than one of many at the other clubs who may or may not come calling. Tat’s our chance of getting him and now is as good as summer when his price is already SET.
He offers AVB a whole load of tactical and formation freedom and negates the immediate need for a reative midfield signing as Mata could move inside and we could watch how Josh gets on at Swansea before either dabbling again in the summer or not having to and getting a RB etc. Hazard makes a lot of sense tactically, talent wise and fits the age range of AVB’s signing profile perfectly and he’s also a great talent now with every chance of getting a whole lot better.
I’m not saying we have to buy him(I would myself as anyone else as good would cost a lot more and as he’s young it’s nowhere near the risk Torres was as he (Eden) would be worth something to sell on even if he didn’t light up the EPL.
Only issue is the CL thing but, as he’d be the same price in summer why not now? I hope we do but as we now sign Cahill type trash I worry we won’t see anything exciting wanting to come again. I’m bi polar mind, so I do swing a bit!
by mastiffchild on Jan 17, 2012 3:41 AM GMT up reply actions
There is no buyout, despite popular rumour.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 3:42 AM GMT up reply actions
I heard Messi has like a twelve euro buyout, but nobody...
…knows bothered to check.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 4:19 AM GMT up reply actions
Argh!
Pick one of: “…has bothered to check.” and “…knows about it.”
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 4:20 AM GMT up reply actions
If he had a 12€ buyout
then I believe there is an built-in compensation estimated to be around € 600m for Barca once this clause is triggered – so it could even be!
Tor ilisar'thera'nal!
He need look no further than who sits on Real's bench
to see that there is a fine line between confidence and overconfidence that could see a plateau in his career.
Being really ambitious doesn’t always make for the best career decisions… just ask our friend Torres (amidst all the recent speculation that he is now looking to leave or Chelsea is looking to be rid of him). ;)
Torres however is a really bad example
if it’s about guys who think they are future world football superstars
Tor ilisar'thera'nal!
CR7 is a bad example
If your talking about overly ambitious players that went for the big move to the biggest club only fail and fall into obscurity, he is still the second best player in the world and scoring for fun, he is the star of a better team than utd, gets to live in Madrid instead of Manchester and makes a lot more money. The only downside he has faced is lack over trophies although since he left he has won 1 spanish cup, utd won 1 league nd da carling cup but utd don’t have compete with Barcelona in every competition, but we do have plenty of evidence to suggest they wouldn’t fare too well. A better example would be Benzema who, despite doing well this year, turned down offers from all the top clubs in Europe to join Madrid only to spend 2 years picking splinters from his backside!
by conorjmartin on Jan 17, 2012 8:21 PM GMT up reply actions
I guess if people dream
and the emphasis is on “dream” about moving to a big club then they don’t think too much about ending up on the bench; somewhat understandable that young prospects think of themselves being good enough to get a decent starting position. I can’t say that about Belgian players – since Chelsea seemingly doesn’t have a bad reputation in Belgium I believe but in most areas in Europe Chelsea in reputation equals the abyss. Maybe this is something what they are fearing about
Tor ilisar'thera'nal!
If we could get him for 40m or less this would be the best news.
But if this is true, does that call into question the reliability of the Jovetic rumours? Could we possibly be in for both of them?
I would interpret this as the team working on plan A at the same time as plan B
It’s a very sensible thing to do considering the time constraint.
by Graham MacAree on Jan 17, 2012 1:41 AM GMT up reply actions
Do the existence of both rumours lend credence to each other?
I wouldn’t think so, but they sort of do. On one hand, both could easily be false, but they could both be Plans A and 2.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 1:44 AM GMT up reply actions
Yes, as does the Vargas rejection
The team is pretty clearly looking for some reinforcement on the wings. That said… well, knowing what a team wants makes it easier to make up a plausible-sounding transfer rumour
by Graham MacAree on Jan 17, 2012 1:45 AM GMT up reply actions
If that's the case, at least they seem to be making up sensible rumors now
Far better than what we’ve seen in years past that would link us to Ribery or Pedro
by Stephen Schmidt on Jan 17, 2012 1:47 AM GMT up reply actions
Most bizarre thing was
even after Ribery signed a new contract and vowed to stay at Bayern for the rest of his career (and finally managed to learn German, by the way) we were still linked to him with astronomical figures. Maybe it’s a running gag, who knows
Tor ilisar'thera'nal!
That's what I hate about transfer rumours.
Context makes them both more plausible and easier to create from nothing. With Hazard, though, it does seem as if the big players are circling.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 1:48 AM GMT up reply actions
I believe the phrase, hope against hope, best describes how I feel about this.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
wouldnt be surprised if after all the effort he decided to go elsewhere
its been a regular end of the story with us….
First Jovetic,
now more Hazard material? I suppose now that there’s only two weeks left and Cahill has been completed, it’s time for some exciting (and probably untrue) rumors.
That being said, if we were to tie up a deal for either one of these two players, I would be immensely happy.
I'm in the same boat as you
I feel pretty obligated to keep everyone updated and throw my thoughts into the mix, but I’m not especially hopeful of a major move
by Graham MacAree on Jan 17, 2012 1:44 AM GMT up reply actions
I have a feeling
Hazard will be the one other signing AVB was mentioning. We could finish the De Bruyne deal as well I guess.
by Dlewis on Jan 17, 2012 3:30 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions
I certainly hope your gut is correct
by Stephen Schmidt on Jan 17, 2012 3:32 AM GMT up reply actions
Although I'd prefer Moura to be honest
by Stephen Schmidt on Jan 17, 2012 3:33 AM GMT up reply actions
I like his overall game a little more
Personal preference on that, but I’ve always had a soft spot for guys that are ridiculously fast. I just love super fast counter attacking play more than the Barca style short passing game, thus my fascination with the Nigerian youth teams.
by Stephen Schmidt on Jan 17, 2012 3:47 AM GMT up reply actions
I would tend to agree, but I think Danny and Ramires give us enough...
…pace on the counter to make Hazard an excellent option. You could always have more though, and we could always use better passing than our two sprinters.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 3:50 AM GMT up reply actions
Thing is, Moura can pass as well
He’s certainly not as refined as Hazard right now, but it’s not a large gap at all.
by Stephen Schmidt on Jan 17, 2012 3:52 AM GMT up reply actions
I meant to say...
…better passing on the counter…
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 3:54 AM GMT up reply actions
Is Moura okay, permit-wise? That would be a distinct disadvantage, if not,
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 3:41 AM GMT up reply actions
Getting one would probably not be an issue in his case
by Stephen Schmidt on Jan 17, 2012 3:43 AM GMT up reply actions
Did you ever grace us with a Moura profile?
I can’t seem to remember…
by Joe DelGreco on Jan 17, 2012 3:48 AM GMT up reply actions
Ah yes...
for some reason I read Moura and thought Gaston Ramirez for some reason. Thanks.
In regards to Moura vs. Hazard: 6 one, half dozen the other. I’d kill to see either in a Chelsea kit
by Joe DelGreco on Jan 17, 2012 3:54 AM GMT up reply actions
It's really a question of taste.
I think either would immediately make us a better team.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 3:55 AM GMT up reply actions
It's also a matter of positioning
Hazard would do wonders for our wings while Lucas might work a little better of were going to put someone behind the strikers.
by Dlewis on Jan 17, 2012 4:36 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions
i reckon it might be easier to land moura
plus he is younger and not CL tied, but he could be more pricey
by blue_is_the_colour on Jan 17, 2012 6:14 AM GMT up reply actions
I'd prefer moura too
stephen I think i’ll go with you on moura,lets unravel him in EPL to the surprise of all. He is a future star,I can’t wait to have him put on chelsea jersey.
by sop on Jan 17, 2012 10:42 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions
I'd prefer moura too
stephen I think i’ll go with you on moura,lets unravel him in EPL to the surprise of all. He is a future star,I can’t wait to have him put on chelsea jersey.
by sop on Jan 17, 2012 10:42 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions
I'd prefer moura too
stephen I think i’ll go with you on moura,lets unravel him in EPL to the surprise of all. He is a future star,I can’t wait to have him put on chelsea jersey.
by sop on Jan 17, 2012 10:42 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions
I'd prefer moura too
stephen I think i’ll go with you on moura,lets unravel him in EPL to the surprise of all. He is a future star,I can’t wait to have him put on chelsea jersey.
by sop on Jan 17, 2012 10:43 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions
Dan Levene tweeted this
“A flurry of late gossip suggesting Eden Hazard may be on his way to Chelsea. One to look into tomorrow. Watch this space.”
It appears my Tuesday is now booked.
Damn you, internet.
by Joe DelGreco on Jan 17, 2012 2:14 AM GMT up reply actions
What's Vagner Love doing on a computer?
by Joe DelGreco on Jan 17, 2012 2:25 AM GMT up reply actions 5 recs
Heh, that's what I set out to do, but this came up first
After a couple disturbing real Matrix-plug-like things in humans and the whole subculture of people with Matrix plug tattoos. Yey, Google Images!
I'm sure he knows as much about this as you or I do...
by el chelsea fuerte on Jan 17, 2012 2:17 AM GMT up reply actions
True...
but unfortunately that has never stopped me from pouring over rumours when I hear one that I’d like to be true.
by Joe DelGreco on Jan 17, 2012 2:19 AM GMT up reply actions
just imagine this team:
Cech
Ivanovic—-Cahill—-Terry—-Cole
Ramires——Romeu——-Essien
Hazard———-Sturridge——-Mata
How about...
Cech
Ivanovic—————DL—————Terry————Cole
-——————-Ramires———Romeu
Sturridge———————-Mata———————-Hazard
-————————————Torres
or…
Hazard—————————Mata———————-Jovetic
-———————————Sturridge
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 2:26 AM GMT up reply actions
Yes please!
drool
Wait what about our newest signing Gary?
Backup/Future Terry.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 17, 2012 3:30 AM GMT up reply actions
Maybe throw Azpilicueta at RB
Just for fun
by Dlewis on Jan 17, 2012 3:42 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions
I shouldn't be saying anything like this now I know
so don’t beat me up – but my knees are mellowing when I try to imagine how Cahill manages to step into Terry’s big big shoes to fill :(
Tor ilisar'thera'nal!
That
looks eerily like my squad on FIFA. Just throw in Hulk, who was another transfer target
With that buyout clause
Hulk might never leave Porto. Their president doesn’t know what the term “negotiation” means.
by Dlewis on Jan 17, 2012 3:47 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions
Martin Lipton has said
in an interview to TNC that Lille are trying to create a market and there is nothing concrete between us & Lille over Hazard. Chelsea are interested but a move in winter seems highly unlikely.
He also expects Chelsea’s second signing to be Azpilicueta(as AVB wants to replace Bosingwa) or maybe a striker…
Now what to make of that??
Also saw a rumor linking us to Lucas Barrios…
by msreya on Jan 17, 2012 3:48 AM GMT via mobile reply actions
Highly doubt we'll move in for a striker
unless Drogba leaves
I feel like there is not as many good strikers as there was 5 or 8 years ago.
Where is the meatloaf?
Striker crisis worldwide
Sounds good
Might also be the reason for inflated prices once “striker” is mentioned
Tor ilisar'thera'nal!
This is irresponsible reporting from the Daily Mail – usually an excellent journalistic publication (sarcasm) – With the outrageous amount of money Chelsea have spent they cannot really buy any expensive players in this window if they are to comply with Financial Fair Play. Its their own fault for overreacting and buying Torres and wasting all that money on David Luiz . I am sorry, but he is vastly overrated.
I think we're in a decent financial position at the moment.
I think we could afford a £20mil player without disturbing FFP too much. Also we need to get up to third place far more urgently than we need to control our spending.
I think I'd still prefer Gotze, if we're talking about Cup-tied young talents
But that’s just really splitting hairs; either this transfer window would be incredible. And yet, that’s why I still find myself splitting hairs – I don’t think either will be available until the summer window at the earliest, regardless of what The Daily Mail tells us!
When Alexis Sanchez plays at your position
You won’t be able to show much.
1970 - 1984 - 2010
"Vamos Fluzão, vamos ganhar
Eu sou do clube tantas vezes campeão!
Vim pra torcer, vim pra gritar
E por você a vida inteira vou cantar!"
You could argue that Pedro has never really been "very good" ever
He was just surrounded by unbelievable talent. I’m pretty sure I could’ve scored a hatful with Messi, Iniesta, et al. buzzing around me, too. (Even without the benefit of many years of training at La Masia.)
Yeah, you and me both.
Where’s a Barca scout when you need a one?! And a time machine, to roll back about 15 years…
I'd even break the bank for it when Barca come knocking out Leverkusen and
you were part of that team! Get the time machine started! Didn’t you say in another thread you had one?
Tor ilisar'thera'nal!
Yep, time vortex
But so far it only works for inanimate objects. Too much entropy in a human being to get it locked down. Stupid 21st century technology!
I doubt this is true
But if it is, I won’t complain about it.
1970 - 1984 - 2010
"Vamos Fluzão, vamos ganhar
Eu sou do clube tantas vezes campeão!
Vim pra torcer, vim pra gritar
E por você a vida inteira vou cantar!"
Via the Twitters (Ian McGarry of BBC Radio 5Live)
“Eden Hazard expects an agreement to be reached with #CFC for his transfer this week. Personal terms are close to completion. Fee approx 28m€”
And, of course, he could very well have just made it up
As somebody on there pointed out, McGarry had Hiddink in as DoF with Van Basten as coach.
Oopsies.
Yes, yes...
I tend to agree. The fee is crazy low – esp if in euros. I’m just here to pass things along. :-D
Guys it's TWITTER OFFICIAL!!!
Lille would be stupid to sell at that price they could get more.
by Sabrina Dessipe on Jan 17, 2012 5:01 PM GMT up reply actions
Try and not get excited
But it’s impossible not to. I can’t imagine it’d be that cheap or this easy… No one else has tried a bid yet. Surely he would want to see all the offers from the big teams? Not just go alright Chelsea it is. Anyway common sense PLEASE BE TRUE!!!
That’s utterly bogus..price is waaaaaaaaaaaaay too low. Plus. why would you go to Chelsea when Real madrid are also after him..and he would start at Real Madrid…
No he wouldn't
Eden Hazard is not starting over Angel di Maria or Cristiano Ronaldo
by Graham MacAree on Jan 17, 2012 6:01 PM GMT up reply actions
If I was the manager he would be starting over Ronaldo
But under Mourinho he wont start.If I was the manager Ronaldo would be rotting on the bench

Nobody would leave Ronaldo on the bench
He is STILL the second best player in the world.
by Avinash Mohan on Jan 17, 2012 8:51 PM GMT up reply actions
hmmm
replace lukaku with mikel, who’s become surplus to requirements with essien and romeu. plus i think raul and rami are capable of playing the dm or deep lying playmaker.
by CardinaLnGold on Jan 17, 2012 6:53 PM GMT up reply actions
Villas-Boas:
“He’s [Hazard] an excellent young talent that exploded last year in Lille’s double-winning trophy season. But there is no official approach whatsoever.”
There you go.
by el chelsea fuerte on Jan 17, 2012 7:53 PM GMT reply actions
I hate these rumours
Everyone is reporting we’re in for him and that a deal should be completed this month. I can’t tell if it’s one where there is a mall amount of truth that everyones jumped on but wont happen or one where everyone’s reporting it and both clubs deny it only for it to end up happening.
to be honest
i don’t think its out of the realm of possibility. As Graham said, last year, who would’ve thought we would get Torres AND Luiz on the last day of the transfer window. Would anyone really be surprised if we got Hazard and Azpilicueta.
by CardinaLnGold on Jan 17, 2012 10:05 PM GMT up reply actions
I would be surprised if we got both.
Less if we got Hazard. If the club actually genuinely want him I’m pretty sure we’d get him. I think we’d beat Real off with the prospect of playing time and I can’t see any other club in England competing with us. United can’t/wont compete with us financially, Arsenal are you know and Liverpool are rubbish. Tottenham don;t have enough money and too many players like him.
If he comes here he’ll be promised a starting position and he will have a team that suits him. An Attacking midfield trio of Danny, Mata and Hazard would be amazing. All three could swap position and cause havoc for defenders and then they have Torres to deal with.



















