Chelsea Vs. Sunderland: Preview
Chelsea vs. Sunderland. Last year, this was our darkest hour. A 3-0 loss at Stamford Bridge to a team that ended up in tenth place. That sort of thing just didn't happen. Not at home. Fast forward 14 months and we're all a lot more used to weird home losses after a half season of epic failure, so that defeat isn't quite the festering psychic wound it used to be, but I'd still really really really like to avenge it.
At this point, that sounds easier said than done against a revitalised Sunderland team. Since Martin O'Neill took the helm of the Black Cats, they've done some pretty impressive things, including becoming only the second Premier League team to dispatch Manchester City. However good the results are, though, Sunderland simply cannot field as good a team as Chelsea can. Against City, they relied on luck (a lot of it) and a fluke offside goal at the death to snatch three points. It's a formula that can work against the top clubs - goodness knows it's worked against us plenty - but it's not the mark of a team that expects to get a result.
There's a lot of fear that Chelsea will lose this game. That's reasonable, considering the way which we've wantonly discarded points this year, but when you compare these two sides it's difficult to see a rational reason why anyone would be picking Sunderland to win. But irrationality is the heart of fanhood, so I guess I shouldn't make too much of a fuss about that one.
Branislav Ivanovic, John Obi Mikel and Micheal Essien are all probably out (although close to returning), but Daniel Sturridge returns from injury, making the front line significantly more fearsome than it is with Juan Mata and Florent Malouda flanking Fernando Torres. It will be interesting to see if Torres gets another chance to start up top - there's a decent argument to be made in favour of a front three of Mata, Sturridge and Ramires. The last one of that trio has been incredibly impressive when he's been pushed wide forward, and with Sturridge in significantly better goalscoring form than Torres it might makes sense to just play the hot hand.
That front three would be an intriguing proposition, but there's also real merit into giving Torres, who isn't playing horribly, a little more time and seeing just what he ends up doing. I'd hesitate to assume he'll rip apart a well-organised, deep-lying Sunderland defence, but he's moving away from the centre of the box and creating overloads in fun areas of the pitch, so he may be able to avoid the worst of things (although his drifting is taking him away from goal, which isn't a huge plus). Andre Villas-Boas will probably go the 'safe' route and play Torres - hopefully that pays off.
That means Ramires goes into the midfield, and after a series of relatively weak performances I'd expect Raul Meireles dropped with Frank Lampard (who was really rather good against Portsmouth) retaining his place. Oriol Romeu is uncontested at the base of the triangle, so in he goes. We're rather constricted in defence as well with Gary Cahill not yet official and Ivanovic out, so expect the standard back four.
Here's my projected Blues lineup, then:
Chelsea (4-3-3): Petr Cech; Ashley Cole, John Terry, David Luiz, Jose Bosingwa; Oriol Romeu, Frank Lampard*, Ramires; Juan Mata, Fernando Torres, Daniel Sturridge.
Look for Lampard to be sacrificed for Malouda should Villas-Boas decide to switch to a 4-2-3-1 if the game's level around the hour mark.
CareFree Chronicles has pointed out Sunderland's threat on the break, so there's not that much point rehashing it. Their counterattacks, however, are not the only threats Chelsea will have to navigate on Saturday - they've got Sebastian Larsson and his magical free kicks to deal with as well.
Considering how bad we've been at defending free kicks this year and how good Larsson is at taking them, I'd be incredibly worried about conceding free kicks anywhere near Cech's box, and our defence is not exactly good at not fouling people. Fortunately, Larsson's main threat is direct, and you'd expect the goalkeeper to do reasonably well against shots from free kicks, but the Swede is still dangerous when he's delivering crosses, and the prospect of him banking the ball off Nicklas Bendtner's head and in is fairly unpleasant.
So! Don't give them too many opportunities to do that, please. Ultimately, I think we'll be fine, although that might be the confidence that comes with not having watched the Aston Villa debacle. Anyway - confident or not, join us at We Ain't Got No History for the match thread at 3:00 PM GMT (10:00 AM EST). It'll be fun. Guaranteed*!
*You get your subscription refunded in full if it's not fun.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"Look for Lampard to be sacrificed for Kalou.."
You mean Malouda right? I’m hoping to see Meireles, Mata, and Torres on the field at the same time for good portion of the game to see them gel
If Danny is up for it
I’d actually not mind trying him out on the left and putting Ramires up top and right, and having Mata in the hole behind Torres. Then maybe Romeu for a lil’ more defense in the middle… and, well, take your pick for the other. Lampard probably, because he’s been a bit more successful as of late, but Meireles plays better when he is not the DM (nor the AM, because he likes long shots and those dont work when your at the edge of the box, as we’ve seen him demonstrate plenty lately).
That doesn't sound too bad. Danny on the left, I mean.
Ramires-Mata-Danny
-———-Torres
And if it goes the way Graham suggested, with Sturridge in the center
then hell, put Torres in the hole. He’s not been too shabby feeding others opportunities. And, Torres did take a decent shot from distance against Villa (but not so much early on against Wolves.. or was that thing a cross? It was bad whatever it was and I am glad he didnt try repeating it the rest of the game).
i like ramires on the right, but i dont like dan on the left much
by blue_is_the_colour on Jan 14, 2012 9:18 AM GMT up reply actions
Have we gotten a good look at that?
Not saying we haven’t, I haven’t been able to see every game and didn’t watch him at Bolton to know. I’ve only seen him go to the left for maybe 45 mins total… not even sure if it was that much. If we haven’t tried it, I am curious how he would do on his left foot there.. would he still cut in, some? No idea…
Anyhow, looks like it wont happen given that Sturridge is on the bench and Ramires is up. Could be that they want to ease him in after the injury. Or maybe he fancies Sturridge playing in the center and switching back and forth with Torres while Drogba is out of town?
I like the idea of Ramires on the right again...
But it’s important to give Torres time after a good performance against Portsmouth. Hopefully Lukaku can sneak on with 10 Minutes left. Subs could very well be Malouda, Meireles, and Lukaku.
by Dlewis on Jan 14, 2012 5:16 AM GMT via mobile reply actions
The idea of LUKAKU sneaking anywhere is frankly laughable. : P
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 14, 2012 9:38 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions
When was the last time
Lukaku got more playing time in one match than … say … 5 minutes?
Tor ilisar'thera'nal!
Carling Cup debacle against Liverpool.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 14, 2012 11:37 AM GMT up reply actions
I think Chelsea should consider sending him on loan
Swansealona would make a good use of him. And it might sound crazy, but why AVB doesn’t experiment putting Torres as an AMC? He’s been suberb in assists and subpar in front of the goal. See Totti at Roma.
1970 - 1984 - 2010
"Vamos Fluzão, vamos ganhar
Eu sou do clube tantas vezes campeão!
Vim pra torcer, vim pra gritar
E por você a vida inteira vou cantar!"
LUKAKU might go on loan next season, but...
…he’s not allowed this season.
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 14, 2012 11:36 AM GMT up reply actions
If we still have Drogba next season
We could send him out for 6 months. Maybe Everton if they still havent got a striker. Or we could swap Drogba for Rodwell.
Drogba for Rodwell?
Wake up, geezer.
1970 - 1984 - 2010
"Vamos Fluzão, vamos ganhar
Eu sou do clube tantas vezes campeão!
Vim pra torcer, vim pra gritar
E por você a vida inteira vou cantar!"
Rodwell would cost 20mil
They need a striker…
Line up
Cech
Bos-DL-JT-Cole
-—Romeu
Meireles-Lampard
Rambo-Torres-Mata
Don't mess with success!
hope these guys keep up with their goalscoring from where they left off.
Just asking the same currently ...
maybe the authours and admins are all chatting on the match thread again and don’t know why we mortals can’t join :(
Tor ilisar'thera'nal!
It might happen when the game starts?
It’s early on that there west coast!
Also, we’re already starting the morning off with idiot pundits; Warren Barton proved Stephen Schmidt right, joined by Wynalda (sp?). First of all, Barton changes his opinion of Chelsea every match, and that drives me mad. Wynalda says that AVB looks like he is lost and does impressions of him on the sidelines in what can be described as a look of “thinking”- something Wynalda hasnt done much of, actually. Must be why he is so unfamiliar with it that he confuses it with other things.
There it is!
Author and Official Fernando Torres Apologist for We Ain't Got No History!
by Kevin Kostka on Jan 14, 2012 2:53 PM GMT up reply actions





















