Chelsea FC's Sweet 16 of 2011 - The Final Showdown
And then there were two.
The best "moment" of Chelsea's 2011 has come down to two players who have had the most positive impact on the first half of Chelsea's current season.
The emergence of Daniel Sturridge started with his loan to Bolton Wanderers in January, where he proceeded to score in almost every single game, helping to ensure their Premier League survival. Back with Chelsea and managing to put an early-season suspension behind him, SHOOTAH has kept up his strike rate and has become a clear & automatic first-choice along the forward line.
One year Danny's senior, the 23 year-old Juan Mata arrived at Chelsea in August and has not wasted any time in establishing himself as Chelsea's creative fulcrum (and ONLY creative fulcrum, as some might tell you). When he's off the pitch or having an off day, Chelsea have often looked lost.
These two have arguably carried us on their backs so far this season. It's only fitting that they get to face off in the final matchup of Chelsea's Sweet 16 of 2011. Having vanquished all other foes before them so far in the bracket (including the new manager himself and our most impressive victory of the past 12 months), only one can come out on top now:
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If I'm honest
I have to feel that we’re being pretty easy on both Mata AND Danny. There’s no way, in a normal season, that they’d get the level of praise from us that they have.
Sure, they’re both class but they’re both really patchy and in and out players who you just cannot rely on to perform yet-though I realise they both need time to fully settle into the side and their places in it. My point is, though, they shine because we’ve been awful most of the season and I struggle to think of more than a couple of games where we’ve really played that well-even Valencia at home we didn’t dominate, you know?
Anyway, someone playing as well as Mata or Danny at, say, Spurs or City wouldn’t get the praise they have with us. I just hope they don’t, as individuals, believe all the hpe because, for me, neither has even cemented their place in our league let alone in our hearts as Chelsea stalwarts just yet. I like them both but there needs to be a lot more consistency before we should be claiming either are World class genius types.
For instance, Danny was terrible when given his way at Blackburn and played through the centre while Mata is all too easily cut out of games these days-increasingly so and while AVB won;t risk playing Josh for whatever reason they’re stuck as the only two likely to do anything much!! Zero creativity outside of these two and, the unfairly hated, Luiz. I made DL MOTM against Villa for us despite the press hating on him again-he AND JT failed on the second goal FFS not just him and apart from that he was our best player.
If we sign Cahill to get Dave out of the team I might just have a bit of a break down!! Why play JT alongside a poor version of, well, JT?
I'm pretty sure we signed Cahill as the replacement for not-first-choice Alex
He knows this, thus the hang up on the personal terms. He probably wants extra money, since he’s nowhere near guaranteed playing time.
This here blog might organize an Occupy Stamford Bridge movement if Cahill gets slotted in ahead of Sideshow Dave.
As far as Danny and Mata…you can only be judged in their current frame of reference…which currently is the rest of the Chelsea squad. There’s no question that they’ve been (by far) the two best performers (with honorable mention to Romeu & Ramires).
Expanding that further, Sturridge has been a consistent and proven performer this whole year in the league (for two teams!) and Mata is (tied for) second to David Silva with 8 assists. Not much more we can ask for.
Random, but where did you get the statistics?
I used to find them on the official PL site but I can’t find them now…
Interestingly
The Premier League Player Performance Index has Terry and Lampard as the best two players on our team. Sturridge is ranked 3rd and Mata 5th.
Not saying that means anything, but I found it interesting.

by 





















