Transfer Thoughts: What Does The Sergio Aguero Deal Mean For Chelsea?
In case you hadn't already heard, Sergio Aguero is about to join Manchester City for £35M, which most are (correctly) describing as a pretty good deal for the denizens of Etihad Stadium. Sure, they're probably going to lose Carlos Tevez within the next few weeks, so on the face of things this isn't a huge upgrade, but Aguero is a good player and they didn't exactly have to pay through the nose for him. All told, £35M seems just about right.
Apart from strengthening City's attack (I'm still not buying them as a genuine title contender, but you never know) and providing Premier League fans with another exciting player to watch for the next few seasons, how does this deal impact Chelsea?
There are two aspects here.
- The first is that Manchester City are now almost certainly out of the race for Javier Pastore. Even if they raise a boatload of money by selling Tevez, by the time that they can refocus on the Palermo midfielder, he'll probably have already been sold. That one of their main competitors has essentially waved the white flag on the Pastore chase can only help the Blues here.
- The second is that Aguero provides a direct comparison with Pastore in negotiations. They're both young Argentinian superstars who have (or had) plenty of time left to run on their contracts with their clubs, and now one has been sold for £35M. That sets a nice little precedent for Chelsea, because despite them playing slightly different positions, it's not hard at all to see Aguero as setting some sort of precedent for a Pastore deal.
Even though I fully expect Aguero to be massively annoying to play against, I think City might have done us a favour here in terms of attracting our own summer targets. After signing Fernando Torres in January, Chelsea were never really in the hunt for Kun, so it's not like he's been swiped out from under our collective nose. And if his move to City helps us land Javier Pastore for a few million less than otherwise, great.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Would you rather have Aguero for 35 or Torres for 50?
"I’d love to walk in and hug everybody every day, but that’s not critical to us winning." - Jon Daniels
Aguero without even thinking about it
by Graham MacAree on Jul 26, 2011 8:52 PM BST up reply actions
Agreed
But I’m not giving up on Torres yet.
by Noleforever9399 on Jul 26, 2011 8:54 PM BST up reply actions
Me neither
But I thought it was too much money at the time, and still do.
by Graham MacAree on Jul 26, 2011 8:57 PM BST up reply actions
I agree with you 100000000000%
But I do think that he, at some point, will get everything together and be a very good player for us.
by Noleforever9399 on Jul 26, 2011 8:59 PM BST up reply actions
Agreed.
Though the points below regarding Lukaku and Suarez are the likely the best set of choices, given the team as presently constructed.
"I’d love to walk in and hug everybody every day, but that’s not critical to us winning." - Jon Daniels
by GhettoBear04 on Jul 26, 2011 9:58 PM BST up reply actions
What's behind door number 3?
I’d have passed on both of them to be honest. Torres is the better player, but at that price and point of his career I’d have passed. Aguero at 35 million is just too much for me for what he brings to the table. Like I said in January, Luis Suarez was the move to make.
by Stephen Schmidt on Jul 26, 2011 9:14 PM BST up reply actions
i don't think anyone disagrees with you on Suarez
Sigh
by Graham MacAree on Jul 26, 2011 9:21 PM BST up reply actions
I'll take Lukaku at anything under 25 over them as well.
Falcao’s buyout would have been better value as well
by Stephen Schmidt on Jul 26, 2011 9:24 PM BST up reply actions
Even though
Aguero might be a bit annoying to play against, I can’t see him doing anywhere near as well as Tevez. Now, if this somehow convinces Tevez to stay another year, I will be mortified.
by bsally on Jul 27, 2011 12:48 AM BST via mobile reply actions
City
So your not buying City as serious title contenders? Even though they finished level on points with you last season and can only improve? Does that mean Chelsea are not serious title contenders?
As for Pastore. If City wanted him they’d have him.
Where
Do you get “can only improve” from? If/when Tevez leaves that’s a colossal blow to their chances-he is far and away their best player. Personally I can’t buy City as title contenders without him.
Right
I agree that Tevez is there best player, and without him I think that they take a step back.
by Noleforever9399 on Jul 27, 2011 5:04 PM BST up reply actions
I disagree that if City wanted Pastore they could just have him.
They can’t just have whoever they want, not everyone wants to go play for City.
by Noleforever9399 on Jul 27, 2011 5:05 PM BST up reply actions
I'm not sold on City under Mancini, I think he's just the wrong guy for the job
He doesn’t seem to be able to create a system that really maximizes the talent he has on that team, or even gets decent results out of it. With the raw attacking talent he has at his disposal he should be far more assertive on the road. Maybe he adjusts this season, but he seems far to much in the Ancelotti single minded mold for me to think they’ll have tremendous success under him.
by Stephen Schmidt on Jul 27, 2011 5:21 PM BST up reply actions
No
they also wanted ibrahimovic last season and they couldn’t have him. if a player doesn’t want to go, he won’t.
Hello
Please stop shouting.
Thank you.
by Graham MacAree on Jul 28, 2011 9:27 PM BST up reply actions



















