Wigan 1 Chelsea 1: Gomez Equalizes Late
Jordi Gomez equalised late on for Wigan in a generally dismal match. Roberto Martinez went with a back five, with Connor Sammon being played ahead of Victor Moses up front. Andre Villas-Boas made one enforced change from the side that ended City's unbeaten run on Monday, Frank Lampard returning to the side in place of the injured Ramires.
Wigan were much better defensively than they had been all season. This came from an unusually fluid but fundamentally defensive formation that saw them sit deep in their own half for most of the game, and Chelsea's midfield and attack struggled to pass through this ten man barrier.
Wigan's defensive shape was unusually flexible, with David Jones willing to double-mark Daniel Sturridge, Diame would look to press the player in possession regardless of positioning, and Caldwell sweeping in behind his defence to deal with long balls.
The game lacked creativity in the final third. After a run of good form, this was a disappointing performance from Chelsea. Wigan were also dour in possession and it took a defensive error to level the scores.
Wigan shape
Roberto Martinez spoke in the post-match press conference of his team's desire to block Chelsea through the middle and attack via the wings. 'Chelsea are very strong through the middle and out wide we have outstanding players in one-on-one situations, so that's what we tried to do.' In this regard, they were successful, with Lampard and Meireles having poor games, and the majority of the Wigan attacks coming through the flanks.
Without the ball, the players would defend deep as a unit, and the midfield trio of McCarthy, Diame and Jones looked to choke out Chelsea's supply. While Wigan often doubled up on the threat of Daniel Sturridge on the right hand side, Juan Mata and Ashley Cole were often given freedom to attack down the left, due to Mohamed Diamé often leaving his position on the right of Wigan's midfield trio to attack the player in possession. As a result, Ronnie Stam often found himself isolated, however the movement of Juan Mata inside and a reluctance from Ashley Cole to attack on the overlap (a trend concurrent with Chelsea's recent improvement in defence) meant Chelsea didn't take full advantage of this situation.
Wigan were also set up well to deal with Chelsea's second option in attack - long balls. Gary Caldwell played like a sweeper in behind his defence whenever Chelsea went for the aerial presence of Didier Drogba. The average positioning chart at half time evidences this, and we can also see the average positioning of David Jones (no.14) very wide on Daniel Sturridge's wing, despite nominally being a central midfielder.
Chelsea changes
Villas-Boas moved at the half time interval to bring greater attacking impetus into Chelsea's play, with the removal of Oriol Romeu for Salomon Kalou. 'We introduced another winger and allowed Mata to play in between the lines." With Wigan's attacking threat non-existant, a true holder was probably unnecessary, and as such the double pivot that was utilized was enough to negate any threat. Kalou played out wide on the left flank, and he immediately stretched the play and created some good opportunities - most notably when Didier Drogba shot into the side netting. Kalou's introduction also freed up Juan Mata into the middle, where he is arguably at his best. However Mata was having a poor game, and was ineffectual in the hole more as a consequence of performance rather than any tactical adjustment from Wigan.
While Kalou wasn't directly involved in the goal, his introduction allowed Chelsea to threaten much more and forced Wigan deeper. It took a moment of magic from Daniel Sturridge - although Ashley Cole's cross was very good too - but it was the overall shift in the tempo of the game that led to the goal.
Momentum switches
The next move was to remove Juan Mata for Jon Obi Mikel, and despite the substitution seeming to hint an inversion of the midfield triangle to place Mikel at the apex, the double pivot was maintained and Lampard was played behind Didier Drogba. In maintaining the 4-2-3-1, Villas-Boas exposed his side to a failing of the formation - the space between the full backs and the attackers. Wigan began to enjoy this space in the width of the park. This, combined with strong Wigan pressing (as is their natural game), meant the momentum fell away from the team in the lead. Villas-Boas looked to address this with his final change, Florent Malouda for Daniel Sturridge, as the Frenchman is more inclined to track back.

However, while the winger's defensive contribution may be more notable, his decisions in possession were alarming, as were Meireles'. After Gael Clichy was dismissed at Stamford Bridge on Monday, Chelsea were very patient and moved the ball well across the pitch, looking to exploit the numerical advantage. Here was a slightly different scenario, but the same applicable ideas. When in the lead against opposition you are technically, physically and mentally better than, it makes sense when in attack to keep the ball as a priority above all else, especially when you have the capabilities to do so. As Pep Guardiola says, the opposition cannot score without the ball. Too often in the final ten minutes did Chelsea simply give the ball away, as evidenced by the number of long balls and red lines on the chalkboard to the right.
While again we can not provide direct evidence that this was the cause of the goal, it is directly responsible. Wigan were revelling in the support of the crowd and their own determination to win. Chelsea's deep defensive block meant that any mistake would be punished.
End notes
After three good results, Wigan brought Chelsea back down to earth. A disappointing result highlights the improvement needed from the side, particularly in creating opportunities when Juan Mata is not playing well. It was unusual that Villas-Boas stationed Sturridge and Mata deeper midway through the first half given their goal threat. Some rotation of the squad may have been needed here - Lampard and Meireles both performed similar roles, and Oriol Romeu was an unnecessary bit-part in the first half. Had he been more flexible, perhaps by opening up the wing backs by dropping in to create the 'Barcelona back three', the game may have opened up earlier. Villas-Boas is young, and he is still learning. Games like this will only help him improve. Credit to Wigan - they defended well, and took their chance.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wide Game?
What intrigued me the most was that we we seem to struggle on grounds that are wide , like blackburn, last night and to some point manutd. ashley cole and bosingwa had so much of the ball but the final cross coming in was a little disappointing. it was a little strange to see ramires not in the ineup.. lamps din do much wrong ,but din do much right either. Do you think we are playing with far too much tempo so early in a game that in the end we are being tired and giving the ball away??
by Harish Narayanan on Dec 18, 2011 4:12 AM GMT reply actions
I think someone said (SAF?) that in order for a team to perform well, at least 6 out of the 11 players
had to be on form (or at least a glimpse of form). Not one of ours showed up. It looked like Sturridge was going to, but AVB forced him deep and he never looked the same after that.
Shit happens? Collective bad performance? Complacency?
God knows, let’s just hope it stops soon cause we got the infamous Xmas run coming up and we need at least 6 more people on form.
by Valens on Dec 18, 2011 4:20 AM GMT reply actions 1 recs
Bosingwa looked good
Way better then what is expected of him and even Terry was good we lost one of our most in form player (Ramires) to injury
Ugh Bosingwa...
Bosingwa’s crossing was horrendous as usual today. I think one he mis-hit one so bad that it went 20 yards to the right of the goal. If you RB is supposed to be used to attack up the right side all game, but cannot make a cross for his life, why play him. I would honestly rather see Ferreira in there, although not as fast, he could probably put a better ball in the box.
The whole team's crossing was outrageously bad
Bosingwa was actually one of the few Chelsea players in the game to come out with any positives.
Very good analysis
As you pointed out: one of the main reasons why we looked so toothless yesterday was down to our midfield not performing well. Now is that because both Lampard and Meireles are temporarily out of form (I think Lampard was) or is it because Lampard and Meireles together tend to not working generally? This would be interesting because we’ve won difficult games without Lampard and we played much better against ManCity; I’m wondering how much an “impact” he had on our sour showing yesterday
Tor ilisar'thera'nal!
It was a poor game on our part.
Nothing much more to say.
The players we were counting on (Lampard, Drogba, Mata and Sturridge) to break down Wigan weren’t their best (or close)
I can’t blame AVB too much and like you say the three matches before we got the best results possible.
Apparently we’re going in for Neymar with a £45 million bid and Tiote so if true i think we’ll be playing an attacking three of Neymar, Mata and Sturridge which i think allows us plenty of room for quick formation changes if needed. For instance if Torres or Drogba was under performing up front and we were already leading we could bring our CF off and replace with a more defensive midfielder. Move Mata to the left and Neymar to the front.
As unlikely as it seems we’ll get Neymar i didn’t think we’d get Torres this time last year.
Please, not Neymar
He’s scrawny, stick thin, a diver and his ego is way too inflated. We don’t need him and he won’t do well in the Premier League
I'll admit i'm not an expert on Neymar
But from the youtube video’s i’ve glimpsed and a quick wikapedia search, he seems to be very talented.
Show me a footballer (especially a forward) that doesn’t have an over inflated ego.
Ramires is quite thin is he not? He’s probably our best player at the moment.
I think Mata’s main position should be in the hole and a left winger that can score and create goals (he’s had 24 goals and 9 assists in 47 matches this year which is better than a goal every other game) would be very valuable. I think he could match Danny’s contribution on the right and then Mata would be free to play his natural game with fewer responsibilities.
That’s just my opinion though. I could be wrong. I said we didn’t need Modric all summer so…
But really we’ve got the money, would you be so angry if he came?
I don’t think he will though as i said before.
Can you cite any sort of example of Neymar's ego being out of whack?
This seems to be a common criticism that nobody can actually back up with fact
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 19, 2011 4:57 PM GMT up reply actions
His manager ended up fired for trying to suspend him for a couple of games
after Neymar got very angry and started making a scene cursing at his manager and team mates because they let someone else take a penalty.
by Sabrina Dessipe on Dec 19, 2011 6:41 PM GMT up reply actions
Here it is
http://www.footballmonkey.net/2010/09/neymars-ego-is-too-big-for-his-head.html
I agree he has amazing skills but he is filled with ego.He is like a more selfish version o CR7.Good But with attitude problem. Thats why I prefer Gotze much more of a team player and down to earth person, much like Messi
Hey guys
Is Iker Muniain of Bilbao for sale?
What would he cost ?
by RamStamford on Dec 18, 2011 3:31 PM GMT via mobile reply actions
I would guess around 20-25 Million
I suppose he’s for sale, there haven’t been many pieces of news that indicate wheather he is or isn’t.
Really Hated This Game
No real invention or creativity from the Blues. The players we have just don’t fit the system that AVB is trying to employ.
I'm not sure the players would've looked good in ANY sort of system out there
This game was a throwback to the doldrums of the Ancelotti era and the latter parts of the Mourinho era. Slow, methodical, etc. 9 times out of 10, we see out the 1-0 draw, despite the worthless performance.
Got frustrating watching AVB decicions in making subs
Honestly i think he lost the game for us, i think he got too comfortable with a one goal lead and put in fill in players to hold the lead which didnt work out so well.
And once again we blame the manager for what the players do
This is just silly on many levels.
‘i think he got too comfortable with a one goal lead and put in fill in players to hold the lead’
This statement contradicts itself.
Chelsea only came close to conceding after horrendous mistakes from Cech and Ivanovic, and with the entire team playing terribly the decision to try to hold onto a lead against a rather toothless Wigan was entirely sensible.
by Graham MacAree on Dec 18, 2011 6:40 PM GMT up reply actions
I'll let mpbx3003 answer this
“If you view AVB’s allegedly poor substitutions based on the situation at the time they were made, and with no consideration of the later results, they’re all correct. Given the tools he’s had on the bench, and the situations we were in, you can’t say they were wrong, unless you count the misfortune which came after. There’s no way to predict that.
Your other problem is that you’re cherry-picking. You don’t mention the substitutions that have been positive [e.g. Kalou v Wigan] or have had no effect. Of course AVB is making terrible substitutions if you only count the ones which have gone bad.
Take yesterday, for example. Wigan were defending incredibly deep, and we had no need for a holder in the first half. We needed more attacking impetus, and Kalou was the best option at that point. In that period, we scored, and Wigan were forced to come forward, that necessitated the re-introduction of a holder. Mata was the least-effective forward at that point, so he went off. I imagine resting him for Spurs was also part of taking him off. The third substitution, Malouda on for Sturridge, was probably for a similar reason.
Our subs were: Ross Turnbull, Fernando Torres, John Obi Mikel, Florent Malouda, Paulo Ferreira, Josh McEachran, and Salomon Kalou.
Turnbull and Ferreira are emergency cover, and Kalou, Mikel, and Malouda were used. The only ones anyone could debate are Torres and McEachran, but I don’t think this game suited them as subs. Torres would have been utterly wasted against the ultra-deep defence, and I’m not sure McEachran would have really given that much either. Really, the only thing that made these substitutions poor was the freak error by Cech which led to the goal.
All in all, I understand that the match was disappointing, and we’re expected to hammer teams like Wigan. I don’t know if any team short of Barcelona has enough to hammer that kind of bus-parking ultra-deep defence. Yes, our players weren’t at their best, but there’s no shame in not destroying them."
by el chelsea fuerte on Dec 18, 2011 6:58 PM GMT up reply actions

by 




















